Do you think self-custodial wallets will remain the go-to for interacting with smart contracts?

Do you think self-custodial wallets will remain the go-to for interacting with smart contracts? 

https://warpcast.com/pugson/0xd7b2da

99% of smart contract interactions will be built into apps with wallets inside them

self custody for the user, experience controlled by developer

power users will be able to interact with dapps however they won't but current paradigm will not stick for much longer

I'll take the opposite side of that: in 10 years, majority of onchain interactions will bypass bespoke contract frontends and will use procedural frontends (either a feature embedded in wallets, or standalone provider).

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

shazow.net

Currently: WhatsABI

yeah i think this is exactly what im referring to

not really, there is only finite number of experiences that you can build into one app

so once you want to do something outside of your app, you will install a new one and thus create a new address

I think its the opposite though: you can have one address (if you want), and you can use uniswap, opensea, etc without ever opening those apps. Only apps provisioning their own EOAs will be weird edge case experiments until they get standardized into procedural frontends.