phil pfp
phil
@phil
What’s your vote and why? https://i.imgur.com/o08hAvU.jpg
51 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Andrew Lee pfp
Andrew Lee
@startupandrew
I voted yes. His actions and policies have been anti-free-speech.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mk pfp
mk
@mk
No because he just wants to save face. Also the greater the wreckage the more accelerated decentralized social adoption.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Blau 🎩 pfp
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
Yes. Because I want my 2020 Roadster.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
rish pfp
rish
@rish
No because entertainment
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
I abstained. This is almost like a Soviet-style show trial - fake af. (And I say this as a strong Musk supporter. I'm just disappointed.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aman Dhesi pfp
Aman Dhesi
@aman
Voted yes because Twitter is not the highest leverage use of his time, would rather he focus on Tesla
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brent Fitzgerald pfp
Brent Fitzgerald
@bf
Option C: burn it all
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed O'Shaughnessy pfp
Ed O'Shaughnessy
@eddieosh
No - skin in the game, centrist, prioritised removing CSAM, not captured, transparency, working out loud, adapting, calls out MSM on their bullshit, cleaning house
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jeanne pfp
Jeanne
@prompterminal
Yes because constant drama. It’s a waste of my time. Ill take my speech elsewhere.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Voted no. He shouldn’t step down, but he should be more transparent around policy changes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
forager pfp
forager
@forager
The criticism was for him to stop banning things based on a whim that entirely negated his stated purpose for buying Twitter. I'm not sure why his response was "Fine, I'll quit if you want me to" instead of to just stop doing dumb stuff. I have been an overall fan of Elon, but he needs to get it together.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Voted yes by accident. I want him to succeed and I want Twitter to succeed, I’m genuinely excited about how we might improve collective sensemaking on a Twitter like tool (not sure it’s the right primitive, but it’s the right direction) But maybe he just doesn’t have the capacity to be sane atm. $48b is a lot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@ryanconnor
Not sure, but big day for web3 social regardless
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
Yes step down. If the reasons arent very obvious to a person, i question whether they have any morals, or think of anyone but themselves. The short list of reasons: - he encourages hate-speech - he censors critics and leftists - by disallowing links he has threatened peoples livelihoods.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
Accidentally voted yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DBKW🦉🎩 pfp
DBKW🦉🎩
@drinkbeerkillwar.eth
Crazy that almost every yes here is because Rome needs to burn. I voted no because he’s a Kompromat. Slava Ukraini!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zico pfp
zico
@zico
yes & solely because of the linktree ban.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jayme Hoffman pfp
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
No. Good luck finding someone else to execute and drive change at the scale and speed.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🪷 pfp
🪷
@pdr
Is this poll a troll? With everyone who votes Yes getting banned 😆
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction