martin ↑ on Warpcast

Content pfp

https://warpcast.com/~/channel/higher

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

martin ↑ pfp

we’ve got a few people who would like grants from the higher party and some ETH and $H to give out any thoughts on how to decide who gets how much?

16 replies

1 recast

15 reactions

martin ↑ pfp

More technical - how do we vote?

2 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

jihad ↑ pfp

small <$750 grants fast and up-front larger grants retro, or at least for those who have already demonstrated proof of work and want to accelerate i think Party governance is fundamentally broken and that grant-giving should be in the hands of 3-5 trusted folks who have a pulse on the ecosystem and can move fast

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Zinger ↑ pfp

Probably based on the likelihood that their initiative can spread awareness of higher and attract new buyers and holders

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Camille pfp

Post a poll with @survey in the Higher Channel, then retrieve the @airstack.eth social score of each voter and distribute $HIGHER proportionally based on the total social score of voters for each project.

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

louis albiverse pfp

louis albiverse

think someone should put forward a grants program proposal specifying total amount to be granted, min number of granteers and vesting mechanism (if any) can be lightweight then community members can give feedback on /higher. maybe vote through the Party or on here

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

john pfp

list the asks and props in a post in the /higher channel public chat in thread then create a poll via ponder

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨

@joshuafisher.eth

Maybe @rocketman could help with /flows for this or @sasquatch could help with Nouns.gg?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Joshua Fisher ⌐◨-◨

@joshuafisher.eth

Where can I send some $H to contribute?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

colfax pfp

do the grant requests outweigh the amount in the party coffers?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

JR ↑ pfp

I don't know how much is available in total, would generally like to see more activity & especially value-add products/initiatives that are built & run for some time. While I don't mind selling some $higher now to fund such things, I believe we could get more $ for $higher in the near future to fund much more contributions. General Approach: 1️⃣ Fund fun, cool inititiaves for/within the community quickly (-1000$) 2️⃣ Enable existing contributors to put more time into value-add projects/products/initiatives to go from hobbyist to full-time contributors. ($1-10K startup financing with basic application, sth/plan to show for) 3️⃣ Fund potential breakout apps, token use cases, primitives with permissionless economic network effects aggressively - IF launched by committed community members. Less financial support for external stakeholders coming in. Gotta prove sth to unlock more. ($10K+ requires some due diligence, maybe milestones; more applicable if there was $10M+ treasury & funding of $100K+)

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saumya Saxena pfp

Fund virality. Proposals to take the higher brand- higher.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Rayna💜 pfp

The ones who post the best memes

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rocketman pfp

check out flows.wtf

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Olle Strandberg Colling pfp

Olle Strandberg Colling

This question is very close to my heart. I'm taking a moment to brainstorm now and see if I can come up with an idea before it's too late. That being said, I'd love to explore this topic further with the community in the future. Making a meaningful contribution to Higher would be incredible, and identifying effective governance mechanisms or methods is crucial.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

streetphotography.eth pfp

streetphotography.eth

Have folks write and submit props via @vocdoni

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Masoud.base.eth 🎩 ↑ pfp

Masoud.base.eth 🎩 ↑

what is the eligibility criteria?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction