Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
28 recasts
29 reactions
Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
What’s your take on friend.tech migrating to its own blockchain? https://unchainedcrypto.com/friend-tech-to-migrate-from-base-to-its-own-blockchain/
15 replies
62 recasts
454 reactions
Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
DAU seems pretty low to matter right now unless the data is incorrect https://dune.com/rchen8/friendtech
0 reply
8 recasts
83 reactions
Ben.degen.eth pfp
Ben.degen.eth
@beninem
This is the continued crypto drama show about an overhyped project run by a clueless, self-destructive narcissist who's now burning his project's strongest bridge for no reason. Unfortunately this show is growing predictable, stale and suffering from low viewership. And I contend there's better things to watch.
0 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
FILTER8 πŸ’™β˜€οΈ pfp
FILTER8 πŸ’™β˜€οΈ
@filter8
Doesn’t matter what chain you are if you don’t have traction. Changing from gas to electric won’t matter if you are not moving.
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Matthew Fox pfp
Matthew Fox
@matthewfox
Friend tech couldn't be more washed if they tried
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Chinmay πŸŽ©β˜€οΈ pfp
Chinmay πŸŽ©β˜€οΈ
@chinmay.eth
It's a little early to do so. 1. It creates its own silos! 2. It's not big enough to have its own network effect yet. 3. Don't fight the bull. Base is the bull.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
cm 🎩🧾 pfp
cm 🎩🧾
@0xdrog
"we're doing a blockchain" is code for "we can't figure out what else to do so we'll just do a chain to look like we're doing something"
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Leo Simon pfp
Leo Simon
@leo5
Understandable, consumer apps should own their whole stack otherwise they risk being farmed by the underlying chain (they bootstraped the whole Base ecosystem)
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
al3jandro.degen.eth pfp
al3jandro.degen.eth
@al3jandro.eth
Thanks for sharing @laurashin , it would be nice to know why the decided to create their own L2 instead of a L3 on top of @base as @goldchain @degenchain or Ham Chain
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
matthewb.eth ↑ 🎩 pfp
matthewb.eth ↑ 🎩
@matthewb
lots of comments about how β€œit’s over for FT” despite its significant mindshare, so I guess we’ll see how this move plays out. they managed to generate significant protocol volume and revenue, imo they (at least) deserve to be taken seriously despite their shitposting facade on twitter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wahoo.eth 🎩✨ pfp
wahoo.eth 🎩✨
@wahoo
Seems to increase risk and decrease likelihood of success. We don't really need 1,000,000 different niche blockchains, IMO.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
oliver pfp
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
booo!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Catch0x22(emojis) pfp
Catch0x22(emojis)
@catch0x22
Idk hopefully they can build more features with an L3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
πš–_πš“_πš› pfp
πš–_πš“_πš›
@m-j-r.eth
I'm not zero-sum, but orderflow is orderflow.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
https://warpcast.com/lsankar.eth/0x4062b7ff feels like capitulation on growing engagement/retention
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Hocilef pfp
Hocilef
@hocilef
We need more L2s
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction