Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
26 reactions
Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
What’s your take on friend.tech migrating to its own blockchain? https://unchainedcrypto.com/friend-tech-to-migrate-from-base-to-its-own-blockchain/
28 replies
19 recasts
129 reactions
FILTER8 ☀️🍖$F8 pfp
FILTER8 ☀️🍖$F8
@filter8
Doesn’t matter what chain you are if you don’t have traction. Changing from gas to electric won’t matter if you are not moving.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Chinmay 🕹️🍿 pfp
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
It's a little early to do so. 1. It creates its own silos! 2. It's not big enough to have its own network effect yet. 3. Don't fight the bull. Base is the bull.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
I'm not zero-sum, but orderflow is orderflow.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
DAU seems pretty low to matter right now unless the data is incorrect https://dune.com/rchen8/friendtech
3 replies
6 recasts
37 reactions
Beninem pfp
Beninem
@beninem
This is the continued crypto drama show about an overhyped project run by a clueless, self-destructive narcissist who's now burning his project's strongest bridge for no reason. Unfortunately this show is growing predictable, stale and suffering from low viewership. And I contend there's better things to watch.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
Friend tech couldn't be more washed if they tried
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
cm 🎩🧾 pfp
cm 🎩🧾
@0xdrog
"we're doing a blockchain" is code for "we can't figure out what else to do so we'll just do a chain to look like we're doing something"
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Leo Simon pfp
Leo Simon
@leo5
Understandable, consumer apps should own their whole stack otherwise they risk being farmed by the underlying chain (they bootstraped the whole Base ecosystem)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
lots of comments about how “it’s over for FT” despite its significant mindshare, so I guess we’ll see how this move plays out. they managed to generate significant protocol volume and revenue, imo they (at least) deserve to be taken seriously despite their shitposting facade on twitter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wahoo.eth 🎩✨ pfp
wahoo.eth 🎩✨
@wahoo
Seems to increase risk and decrease likelihood of success. We don't really need 1,000,000 different niche blockchains, IMO.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
oliver pfp
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
booo!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
al3jandro.eth ➡️ DevCon pfp
al3jandro.eth ➡️ DevCon
@al3jandro.eth
Thanks for sharing @laurashin , it would be nice to know why the decided to create their own L2 instead of a L3 on top of @base as @goldchain @degenchain or Ham Chain
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Catch0x22 pfp
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
Idk hopefully they can build more features with an L3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
lucky pfp
lucky
@lsankar.eth
https://warpcast.com/lsankar.eth/0x4062b7ff feels like capitulation on growing engagement/retention
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sematary pfp
sematary
@snowstriper
1000X UPUP
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KyleX pfp
KyleX
@traderx
That’s so cool
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mgkbr pfp
Mgkbr
@mgkbr
eh, I never really understood Friend-tech to begin with. They're doing the same thing Aragon did. Remember... remember that one? Aragon? No? Case in point.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Muhoil pfp
Muhoil
@tbank
Wher is yur etas baby
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dulng pfp
Dulng
@duongvu999
감사해요
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction