July pfp
July
@july
An idea / hypothesis I have: The jobs that are going to be most decimated by this current (and the next few subsequent) forms of AI imo is the jobs that Graeber's talks about in "Bullshit Jobs" Here's the original essay that spawned the idea of the book: https://strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/
15 replies
14 recasts
68 reactions

July pfp
July
@july
From the essay in 2013: "...jobs have had to be created that are, effectively, pointless. Huge swathes of people, in Europe and North America in particular, spend their entire working lives performing tasks they secretly believe do not really need to be performed. The moral and spiritual damage that comes from this situation is profound. It is a scar across our collective soul. Yet virtually no one talks about it."
1 reply
2 recasts
32 reactions

limes pfp
limes
@limes.eth
My hot take is just the opposite. There will be even more bullshit jobs that exist because average productivity makes it okay to have so many people doing effectively nothing but getting paid for it
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Fran d’Amore pfp
Fran d’Amore
@ffran
asset managers are done huh.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sachin pfp
Sachin
@sach
I think what will likely happen is lot of jobs will get eliminated under the guise of it being bullshit but the hit rate would be 50:50 at best. Byrne had a great piece about how Graeber's research for bullshit jobs was just people emailing him and saying they hate their job https://www.thediff.co/archive/bullshit-jobs-is-a-terrible-curiosity-killing-concept/
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Damn, I only see this excellent thread now, just after posting mine on academic attainment in the AI age. I would have gladly referenced it because they complement each other nicely
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

marlo pfp
marlo
@marlo
i think bullshit jobs will continue for as long as we keep requiring people to work to live. they will just take new forms. we have more than enough resources for everyone, so to keep people working we have to invent more bullshit to do and to consume
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Zeen Train  pfp
Zeen Train
@zeentrain
A fun question to ask is out of the places where there are BS jobs (assuming you prescribe to the idea), how long will it take the companies to make the transition? If most BS jobs live in slow moving legacy businesses, how long is the transition period?
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Tangentially related but, I was reading a post a while ago that put forward the idea that part of the reason that we have so many giant, over bloated organizations that could effectively be done with 12-100 people instead of thousands is because of social status games. The more people that you have working under you, the more that you manage, the higher your social status. Bullshit jobs may, in part, be a consequence of our biopsychology
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

john pfp
john
@know
I thought this was commonly accepted!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡 pfp
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
Tidbit: the draft working title of Atlas Shrugged was “The Strike”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

m_j_r pfp
m_j_r
@m-j-r.eth
imho, kind of like an economic salting of what would otherwise be conspicuous consumptive discovery (therefore UBI is worthwhile on the basis of identity).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
“… rage is directed precisely against those who actually do get to do meaningful work” reflective of this deeply hard wired outrage: 🐵..🙈 https://youtu.be/-KSryJXDpZo?si=hFu-Ca0d0txYTmC5
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Shashank  pfp
Shashank
@0xshash
more work required to build and maintain the physical world over the digital world
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp
Kieran Daniels 🎩
@kdaniels.eth
Aka lawyers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Leo pfp
Leo
@lsn
Have you read Noah Smiths rebuttal of the BS Jobs concept? It changed my mind on the topic
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions