Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA If you're majority casting low effort stuff like this, Warpcast is going to start filtering this out of feeds for people who don't follow you. Still trying our approach of education / assume good intent (esp. since people are paying money to the protocol)!
27 replies
9 recasts
122 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
And for those who think this is a losing battle—maybe! But high ROI to try education (doesn't require any engineering work). But our plan is to start filtering this. And remember, you're free to choose a client that has a different approach. Similar to email services having different spam filters.
2 replies
1 recast
11 reactions

🪱 pfp
🪱
@worm.eth
if these are bots, why would education work?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

mk pfp
mk
@mk
*taps thumbnail* whew it isn’t me
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Rob Sanchez pfp
Rob Sanchez
@robrecht
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
Wait! Do I see each post’s views/impressions in this screenshot? Is this going to be released to all?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
One solution could be to: - create a Fortune Cookie channel - have these casters find their way there - have a builder make a web app that randomly serves a fortune cookie cast
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Maybe have a pop-up screen upon opening WC the 1st time, that displays the latest ground rules and an “Accept/Acknowledge” button? And have those available after that in a menu? I feel like many new users cannot find out easily about what’s acceptable on WC, or find out the hard way through a shadowban.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Satoshi Tomatomoto pfp
Satoshi Tomatomoto
@tomato.eth
I'm in favor of filtering this stuff out, but I'm curious how it's being done. Is it a simple check for repetitive posts and single word replies, or is there some sort of more advanced AI?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
who are we to marginalize the undesirables?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

WebOfTrust pfp
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
Even if I got filtered out, this is something I support and would like to see the result of it after 2 months.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
What client is the screenshot from?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦  pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
Great. I’m tired of blocking low engagement casts, and honestly as a paranoid security person I’m glad you’re taking action. I have no proof of malicious behaviour yet but these low engagement casts make me more skeptical. Also, do I see viewcount 👀
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

Winston Laoh pfp
Winston Laoh
@winstonlaoh
Is the filtering/sorting algorithm for Warpcast publicly available anywhere? I think this is a great move, but I can imagine some people getting up in arms about it. Having more transparency on it would probably shut them up.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

HecTony pfp
HecTony
@hectony
The effort is nice to try to minimize spam/worthless casts, it would also be ad-hoc imo, if you highlight the algorithm to boost the worthy ones. Tbh in my feed I find a lot of interesting and diverse posts, which is why I spend more time here than on X. I say this because I believe it is pretty obvious...
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Chun-Li pfp
Chun-Li
@0xchunli.eth
These look like bots. Perhaps they are trying to amass followers (by way of engagement albeit low quality) to eventually sell the account (swapd for example)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨 pfp
MetaEnd.degen🎩🚨
@metaend.eth
Reads like a low effort automated bot?
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

Atenea 🎩🍖🦷 pfp
Atenea 🎩🍖🦷
@goldenwitch
Warpcast is undoubtedly a high-level protocol. Now I'm left wondering if I'm going to be able to live up to it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

chandresh 🪴 pfp
chandresh 🪴
@chandresh.eth
and what about this? not a direct malicious behaviour, however, annoying to see programmatic likes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cristian Strat pfp
Cristian Strat
@c
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction