Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Having a conversation with @balajis.eth soon about Farcaster re: network states. What should we talk about?
35 replies
13 recasts
105 reactions

Ben  - [C/x] pfp
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
How Farcaster can support moving from theory to execution and experimentation.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Tell him hi from his fans 👋😆 Maybe not exactly relevant to FC but has his thoughts evolved on network states needing one and only one commandment? Or maybe it’s relevant to channels? 🤔
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Emre Ekinci pfp
Emre Ekinci
@emr.eth
Onchain payments are the native form of payments for network states. What’s his view on privacy and compliance when it comes to onchain transfers? One more important than the other?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gökhan Turhan pfp
Gökhan Turhan
@gokhan.eth
Do network states/ patchworks need physical presence necessarily?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
Public vs private online spaces for potential network states to discuss? Obv a mix, but what’s it look like?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TiⓂ️brrr 🎩🧢 ↑ 🍖  pfp
TiⓂ️brrr 🎩🧢 ↑ 🍖
@twb
What does a network state look like that anyone can drop into digitally but doesn’t even require land last? Aka my hash is my passport.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Darryl Yeo 🛠️ pfp
Darryl Yeo 🛠️
@darrylyeo
Up-and-coming network states? Network states that don’t yet realize they are a network state?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
What are some names of future (or existing) channels that he thinks have the greatest chance of becoming a new network state? Network state defined as: majority of constituents of a county (or state) of a UN-recognized country are part of that channel (Under this definition, Mormons running Utah is a network state)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

adiba pfp
adiba
@adiba.eth
What are the arguments for and against Balaji personally starting a network state?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

grin pfp
grin
@grin
His guess on how long before he’ll be able to tell ppl with a straight face that he lives in a network state Being a digital citizen doesn’t count. I’m talking primary residence
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Idan Levin 🎩 pfp
Idan Levin 🎩
@idanlevin
What are the barriers that exist today from making the Network State vision come to life?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
- how do the new “borders” look? - How do big Tech players play into the dynamic of cloud-states? https://warpcast.com/lesgreys.eth/0xa21385
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kbc pfp
kbc
@kbc
What information about the state of the network state should ppl have access to to create momentum?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
What step has his Network State's Seven-Step Plan reached? Will farcaster be the preferred communication tool among the citizens of the Network State, and why?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zach pfp
Zach
@zachterrell
It would be cool if he could give a list of things that he wants to see built on FC like the @barmstrong 10 ideas thing
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
can a network state set physical roots down and still be both nonviolent and truly sovereign? if so, how?
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Corbin Page pfp
Corbin Page
@corbin.eth
Why did he choose "grey" to represent the new tech-forward, moderate political class? Why not purple? 💜
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

horsefacts pfp
horsefacts
@horsefacts.eth
1) How can we better model clusters in a network graph without being too reductive (blue/grey/red only) or complex (modeling 1000 different dimensions)? 2) It's possible for "tribes" to trade and cooperate across the boundaries of very different value systems. Where can his tribes trade instead of fight?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
Network states require dwellers, citizens, and homes where they reside. What will constitute the future digital home? The mirror of physical home?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions