Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How should we refer to FC channels? f/memes feels too Reddit f.memes has Usenet vibes. And future optionally to do stuff like f.memes.dank or f.memes.wholesome
48 replies
13 recasts
57 reactions
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
Aren't channels an WC thing and not an FC thing? Or are channels officially part of the protocol?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Charlie Harrington pfp
Charlie Harrington
@whatrocks
fc reads farcaster to me more than f fc.memes
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
df pfp
df
@df
f://memes.dank
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
↑ j4ck πŸ₯Ά icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck πŸ₯Ά icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
what about far.(channel) far.memes far.apple far.art πŸ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
John Passafiume pfp
John Passafiume
@passafiume.eth
fc is stronger imo bc of the double allusion: hits both caster and channel
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
horsefacts πŸš‚ pfp
horsefacts πŸš‚
@horsefacts.eth
"xyz.farcaster.memes.base.internal"
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Maybe f-memes for better readability, unique visual among social stuff, but also still a nod to nerd shit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
I still vote for f/ because it’s easy to relate to for the Reddit crowd, and we can benefit more from the network effect by making the transition smoother than by trying to be clever about some new taxonomy. Also, as much as love(d) Usenet, it’s dead Jim, and the period clashes with URL parsers.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Matthew Barton pfp
Matthew Barton
@mbar
f(memes)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
+1 from me on: fc.<channel>
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Matt Garcia pfp
Matt Garcia
@mattgarcia.eth
Sometimes familiar is the best UX. So in that sense f/memes isn’t necessarily bad. In the same way that many things having twitter vibes is not a problem. On the contrary it can be easier for people to quickly β€˜get’ the value proposition: β€œa wow, look, a twitter with reddit aspects!”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
might be a good question for survey @ba @cojo.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
Usenet style!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rob Morris pfp
Rob Morris
@recipromancer.eth
f#memes, with the bonus that f can then be substituted for the entry point URL, leaving the / free for endpoints without collision.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zoz pfp
zoz
@zoz.eth
Dot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
✿ ZACH HARRIS ✿ pfp
✿ ZACH HARRIS ✿
@zachharris.eth
I like the sub sub domain idea, ser 🫑
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Really like this idea Also kinda like an FNS of sorts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
fc🀌memes
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
sorry but f gives me f/you vibes 😭 on the other hand, fc/you is even worse...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction