Content pfp
Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
$6.6B in consumer spend on OnlyFans last year and no serious crypto competitor is WILD https://x.com/ballmatthew/status/1832064136798408835
35 replies
0 recast
43 reactions

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
Farcaster could opaquely scale for this. probably an opportunity for another client.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
@ameensol has been at this for years https://www.spankchain.com/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Leo pfp
Leo
@lsn
Thinking about the economics of this Payment fees are no more than 4% Crypto is 0% basically, but all the other costs in the business are still there Crypto doesn’t reduce the cost that much; why would someone compete just to do 4% better?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Maretus pfp
Maretus
@maretus.eth
I already said Moxie + Onlyfans is a billion dollar idea.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

HH pfp
HH
@hamud
I don't see how crypto would give you any advantage here, you'd still be responsible for moderation and compliance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

binocularsXL🎩 pfp
binocularsXL🎩
@binocularsx
Wow That’s a lot of subscriptions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kk pfp
kk
@king
money laundering
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tokenized Human pfp
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
Can't you pay on OnlyFans with crypto or is that PornHub now that I think about it? This may be a regulatory issue more than anything else. I can see the headlines now "MoxxieFans responsible for explosive farcaster growth"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
there's some popping up :)
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Christian Montoya 🦊 pfp
Christian Montoya 🦊
@m0nt0y4
The problem with this thesis is that if OF is successful then why would anyone want a competitor that is more difficult to use? Crypto thrives when it’s doing something that you can’t already do with fiat. A crypto OF would just be niche.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gwynne Michele pfp
Gwynne Michele
@thecurioushermit
Not gonna lie, I know a lot of SWs who would benefit from crypto. Whoever makes the web3 OF is going to make SO much money. But also, the regulatory headaches of that industry... oof... paired with the regulatory threats to crypto? I can see why no one's done it so far.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

darcris pfp
darcris
@darcris.eth
and those billions of $ is 95% from men 😎
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

law pfp
law
@traguy.eth
Lmfaooo Is there a stat to see what gender & age bracket is responsible for the most of that $6.6B?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
opportunity for a client.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

  pfp
@na
you did saw the hobbies attractiveness rankings right
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Joshua Hyde pfp
Joshua Hyde
@jrh3k5.eth
There are stumbling blocks to an end-to-end solution for workers. I recommend this article as a read - it highlights the problematic dependencies crypto still has on banks. https://www.wired.com/story/sex-workers-crypto-failing-them/
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trish🫧 pfp
Trish🫧
@trish
There is/was one. I wish I could remember the name. No idea if it’s still around.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

✿ Gil Alter ✿ pfp
✿ Gil Alter ✿
@gilalter.eth
centralized platforms like onlyfans can’t compete long-term. they take a big cut, control what creators can post, and change the rules whenever they want. Their game is over sooner than later 👋
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

✿ Gil Alter ✿ pfp
✿ Gil Alter ✿
@gilalter.eth
onlyfans - creators earn by charging for exclusive content (often adult). fans pay monthly or per post, and can tip or pay for private messages. on farcaster - using the moxie protocol (4 example) - creators drop fan tokens, fans buy tokens to unlock content, tip, or pay for chats. creators keep control of earnings with no middlemen. Stone Age>>>bronze Age
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction