Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Some people here and on X have expressed outrage at parts of the opening ceremony of the Olympics in France. As someone who is both natively French and a "global citizen" (lived on four continents, visited 50 countries, expat for nearly 20 years), I wanted to share my dual perspective. My goal is not to pass judgment on Friday's performance, but rather set the cultural context in which it was delivered. So, don't shoot the messenger. Also, references are annotated in brackets like this: [i] for further reading at the end. The TL;DR is that the French brand of secularism (laïcité) is unique, highly idiosyncratic, and part of the core identity of the French republic; it's understandable that it does not translate well to an international audience. Now, onto the 🧵: 1/9
51 replies
42 recasts
254 reactions

Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
> That show was blasphemy! The concept of blasphemy (the action of speaking sacrilegiously about a god or the sacred) may speak to you, but it explicitly does not exist in secular France [i]. In France, religions are treated as mere ideas, and like all ideas, they can be examined, praised, criticized, and even mocked. In the eyes of the secular French republic, no text or religious icon deserves special protection, no matter how holy to some. That aspect of freedom of speech is as foundational to the French as the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is to Americans. Of course, people whose identity is rooted in faith might take offense at that, which leads me to... 2/9
6 replies
2 recasts
64 reactions

tomato pfp
tomato
@tomato.eth
Thanks for taking the time to explain. I'm sure the people who are outraged about it will find a way to still be outraged, though. 😀 1688 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

cyrus  pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
Great thread, full of common sense and knowledge of culture. I see nothing but facts :) In decades to come this ceremony will be seen as a daring artistic experiment and a snapshot of contemporary society, rather than a by the numbers arrangement or 'show of strength' type ceremony that we have seen for years. You're also really kind to take the effort to explain things with references. Hopefully people will learn to do their own research.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

kk pfp
kk
@king
you should post this on twitter tom, see all sorts of emotions from the replies
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

John Camkiran pfp
John Camkiran
@johncamkiran
Valuable perspective. To keep Farcaster interesting, I will attempt an objective defence of the outraged: 1. The use of the opening ceremony to express the French political principle of laïcité violates Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter, which prohibits political expressions, except by participants under certain circumstances. 2. Burlesque is a category of entertainment that is broadly deemed unsuitable for children, who compose an important part of the Olympic audience.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Meg pfp
Meg
@meganmichelle.eth
As a French citizen, did you feel like the show reflected France’s culture well, then? Were you proud of it?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dusan.framedl.eth pfp
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
i love the deep dive. thank you for that. i haven't watched the ceremony, but given the context you provided i feel as if those in charge failed to read the room and misjudged how much influence the ceremony carries. i come from slovakia and the political situation there is pretty rough right now. you wouldn't believe how much support russia gets and if it were purely up to people, they would've given away the whole country to putin in no time. and this state of mind is rooted in successful anti-western propaganda drawing from similar naive expressions ("attacks on traditional values"). if nothing else then timing was certainly off.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Darryl Yeo 🛠️ pfp
Darryl Yeo 🛠️
@darrylyeo
Great context. Haven’t yet watched the show but saw a lot of the outrage on Twitter and wanted to reserve my judgement.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
Very well thought out and digestible explanation, thank you for this! 5000 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Beninem pfp
Beninem
@beninem
Well said. My kiddo didn't really get any of it and I wasn't a fan of my kiddo watching the 3-some being alluded to by the 3 library folks... But I see now where they're coming from via your post. 10000 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

brownalytics 🎩 pfp
brownalytics 🎩
@brownalytics
666 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

youssef pfp
youssef
@yssf.eth
also French and you’re 100% right incredible how the same people who criticize what they perceive as the suppression of their historical culture and identity are the first one to attack a country making references to its own history and culture
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Cc @yeoro.eth ↑ Ro, we were discussing yesterday. Thomas has put the cultural primer together for it. 🇫🇷 I love that it wasnt a bland panvoidity, nor a french cliche. If it pissed a few people off, and caused even more people to think something new then the “art” of it was doing its job.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Arjan | That Poetry Guy pfp
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
This is an amazing thread. Vrey well explained. I personally thought the show was fantastic. Thanks for this extensive background. Very useful insights. 121 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

jw-rx pfp
jw-rx
@jw-rx
great thread, well explained in detail 100 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Andreas Birath pfp
Andreas Birath
@andreasbirath
Nuanced and informative. Thanks.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
This was very enlightening; thank you for sharing! 🙏🏻
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
I’m totally ok w/ that show & finding it fun & funny that both ppl in the 2 countries i lived longest are outraged by the show lol
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Pedro pfp
Pedro
@pedrowww
Great thread. I'm French myself and I loved the ceremony. It was a very representative display of our national trait: irreverence. I honestly think that everyone has a very vanilla perception of what French culture is (beret, baguette, charm and beauty...) and that's what they were expecting to see. But what the world doesn't see (or don't want to see) is that we love provocative stuff. Our cultural icons were shocking at the time (Gainsbourg!!) and we still celebrate people taking brutal jabs at institutions (Charlie Hebdo anyone?). All in all, I'm glad the world got to see another facet of who French people are, and one that finally puts the sticky clichés to bed.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions