billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
What does it mean to have a social network where you can't delete anything? I don't think we have quite grasped the implications yet
14 replies
0 recast
39 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Is FC practically any different from X in this regard? In both, you can delete your content from the network, but people can preserve your content against your will be screenshotting or using APIs to download.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
It's materially different. It's extremely hard, if not impossible for a third-party to archive everything from Twitter. But for FC it's so easy (by design) to have the full global state - I just need to run a hub (and make sure I don't delete anything)
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Google also has indexes of all your old tweets
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

yesyes pfp
yesyes
@yesyes
This. Web2 has a good illusion of privacy (as opposed to having actual privacy) while fc has a clear distinction of what's private and what's public.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
what's private on fc?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

yesyes pfp
yesyes
@yesyes
Technically all the data that they don't collect on a protocol level that the other social apps collect( because you can make your own client if you want). Look at Instagram's privacy policy and see how vague it is about what data is collected. Everyone knows that these companies collect a shit ton of app usage data.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

yesyes pfp
yesyes
@yesyes
Example(from insta data policy)- Location-related information can be based on things such as precise device location (if you've allowed us to collect it), IP addresses and information from your and others' use of Meta Products (such as check-ins or events that you attend)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
I'd expect future FC clients to collect similar amount of data as Instagram or Tiktok
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction