billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
What does it mean to have a social network where you can't delete anything? I don't think we have quite grasped the implications yet
12 replies
0 recast
37 reactions

Lingo pfp
Lingo
@evmguide
Wait… you can’t delete here?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
If you publish something on a public social network, there should be no expectation that it can ever be removed. It can be removed from indexing, and thus "mostly hidden", but someone can always keep a copy. And since it is signed content on FC, it's can be proven to be a non-forged copy.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
I‘ve end gamed this partially already when people hard turned against me during some discussions and I think it‘s actually not so nice. IMO Warpcast and FC needs to give much better safety tools and allow users to control more. E.g. I should be able to control my digital space 100%
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Is FC practically any different from X in this regard? In both, you can delete your content from the network, but people can preserve your content against your will be screenshotting or using APIs to download.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
I guess you could say the same thing about onchain data as well, but I think it's so early and so much is being tested that even though it seems like a super impt question to be asking, it's not one we stop and think about all the time
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ashutosh pfp
Ashutosh
@ashutosh
Yes, and I wonder how Farcaster/Warpcast is going to comply with right-to-deletion requests Interesting thread on this: https://www.threads.net/@alex.stamos/post/CuYUQ3YLRBo/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

Leighton pfp
Leighton
@lay2000lbs
It’s definitely not ideal. Should be some solve for it though
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

David (d/acc) pfp
David (d/acc)
@promptrotator.eth
Allows for more robust onchain and pseudonymous identities, which is a building block for many crypto usecases like under-collateralized lending.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I’ve been hoping for this to be the feature!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
If I had social media when I was a teenager and couldn't delete the posts, I'd have been canceled for sure. So either the society will start being okay with "People sometimes say dumb shit but they change their pov" or we'll all get canceled for our drunk posts from 7 yrs ago.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
I've had some interesting discussions in this recently on Twitter.. IMO, Web3 social without privacy is NOT an upgrade https://twitter.com/wslyvh/status/1676965069945708546
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nulladdr.eth pfp
nulladdr.eth
@void
when was it ever possible to delete anything, i thought everyone keeps records
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction