billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
What does it mean to have a social network where you can't delete anything? I don't think we have quite grasped the implications yet
14 replies
0 recast
41 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Is FC practically any different from X in this regard? In both, you can delete your content from the network, but people can preserve your content against your will be screenshotting or using APIs to download.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
It's materially different. It's extremely hard, if not impossible for a third-party to archive everything from Twitter. But for FC it's so easy (by design) to have the full global state - I just need to run a hub (and make sure I don't delete anything)
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
OK, I actually thought about this a bit more after reading. And yes, there is one key difference: - If I publish to X and later delete it, you may back it up or screenshot it, but unless everybody witnessed it, you may also lie about "backing-up" my statement. What if u made it up? I have plausible deniability. (1/2)
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

Wesley— oss/acc pfp
Wesley— oss/acc
@wslyvh.eth
With X I only need to request them to take down my content. Even if others index it, it still gives plausible deniability (esp. with more generative content/fakes/AI, etc.). With FC and other web3 socials, easy indexing + cryptographic proofs would make it hard to completely delete (or deny)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions