billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
What does it mean to have a social network where you can't delete anything? I don't think we have quite grasped the implications yet
14 replies
0 recast
39 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Is FC practically any different from X in this regard? In both, you can delete your content from the network, but people can preserve your content against your will be screenshotting or using APIs to download.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
It's materially different. It's extremely hard, if not impossible for a third-party to archive everything from Twitter. But for FC it's so easy (by design) to have the full global state - I just need to run a hub (and make sure I don't delete anything)
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Google also has indexes of all your old tweets
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
There has always been indexing, but the scale & accessibility is very different for web3. No API today will give me Twitter's global state (& full history). https://warpcast.com/billzh/0xded68a Also as others have pointed out, messages are not signed on web2 social, which may give you plausible deniability
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

yesyes pfp
yesyes
@yesyes
This. Web2 has a good illusion of privacy (as opposed to having actual privacy) while fc has a clear distinction of what's private and what's public.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction