Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Wrote up some thoughts on evolving Farcaster into a protocol for all social networks, and not just twitter-like ones Feedback welcome! https://hackmd.io/@farcasterxyz/Hyyt7NFb2
20 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
cc @blobs and @rckprtr
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
๐Ÿฅ Inspiring post! Curious what you had in mind with parallel namespaces
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
love the thoughts @v one observation: we're still framing web3 social technologies on web2 primitives (e.g. web3 twitter, facebook, whatsapp, snapchat), kinda like horseless wagons, flying cars -- looking forward to defining new primitives as well!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Landon pfp
Landon
@lndnnft
"But significant strides can be made by focussing on the low-hanging kiwis first" love it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
{ Lawson.fm } โญ•๏ธ pfp
{ Lawson.fm } โญ•๏ธ
@lwsnbaker
๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
"Could Farcaster become a 'Turing-complete' protocol allowing different social networks to be built?" 1000% Yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jithin Raj pfp
Jithin Raj
@jithinraj.eth
Thank you, been wondering about the FC plans for the points mentioned. The main takeaway being decentralized social platforms are way more complicated and still so much in making. We have solved identity and text storage but will take some time to evolve up to the current level of Web2 โ€˜socialโ€™ & โ€˜mediaโ€™.๐Ÿš€
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sriram Krishnan pfp
Sriram Krishnan
@sriramk.eth
would be good to work through what a non text based network may look like (say...TikTok?)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Britt Kim pfp
Britt Kim
@brittkim.eth
๐Ÿฅ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Karthik Senthil pfp
Karthik Senthil
@karthiksenthil
Really enjoyed this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
{ Lawson.fm } โญ•๏ธ pfp
{ Lawson.fm } โญ•๏ธ
@lwsnbaker
Long-term storage ๐Ÿซก
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Noah Bragg ๐ŸŸ๐Ÿฅ” pfp
Noah Bragg ๐ŸŸ๐Ÿฅ”
@nbragg
Like how you used kiwis there. I love the idea of this. I think these protocol capabilities would really allow for more interesting clients to pop up and give them a way to differentiate.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
This is an excellent piece of writing / thought leadership. I'm excited to see what's next for the Farcaster protocol!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
OG dad pfp
OG dad
@boscolo.eth
This is awesome! I for one wanted to start building on Private casting months ago!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MOLO pfp
MOLO
@molo
Really into message tagging: I think it can drift between flexible schemas and context separation. Tags for messages can allow clients to not just understand content context but also client context itself: makes filtering way simpler and imo makes the possibility for client-based communities much stronger
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang /degencast SOON๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Liang /degencast SOON๐ŸŽฉ
@liang
the difference between fc and ceramic is getting narrow๐ŸŒ๐ŸŒ
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
Awesome!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brian Li ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‘พ pfp
Brian Li ๐ŸŠ๐Ÿ‘พ
@bli
Huge fan of the idea of private casts! Imo closed social networks will be equally as important as open ones
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraรฑa pfp
Daniel Lombraรฑa
@teleyinex.eth
Really nice article. While reading it I got some similarities with lens and how you can create smart contracts attached to your identity. That modularity is really nice. On the other hand, they don't have separated graphs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction