Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) pfp
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
Does ENS need to create its own L2 chain or nah? I want to use my .eth address everywhere.
15 replies
2 recasts
54 reactions

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
why are you thinking L2 chain for pure ENS? what would be the benefits? how would that make ens resolution available everywhere?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

charlie.base.eth pfp
charlie.base.eth
@chuckstock
sign in with farcaster :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dogan pfp
Dogan
@doganeth
We dont need ens L2 for this We already have CCIP read
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
No, but I think there should be some kind of CCIP cross chain protocol to share the info from the L1. Honestly, I’d even sign an L1 transaction if I could list all the addresses across chains I want to reverse record to my ENS.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Your cast reads like it is implicit to not be able to use your ENS everywhere if they were to run their own chain. I am not sure why this would be the case. If they have technical reasons to run an L2 they should go ahead. I think their vision is to let ENS eat the world in any event.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

anon 🎩 pfp
anon 🎩
@anon.eth
Why don't you use it here yet?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

dyor pfp
dyor
@maverick.eth
Eh? Use it here...
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Patrick pfp
Patrick
@patrickayelle.eth
Yes - If we have Universal synchronous composability.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
Does a separate L2 accomplish that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ashinthewild pfp
Ashinthewild
@ashinthewild
why settle for an l2. they should go lx i mean its mathematically 5x better...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

max @ devcon β†‘πŸŽ© pfp
max @ devcon β†‘πŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
There are too many chains already man, time to get based for once
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sean C pfp
Sean C
@cove
ENS needs to be everywhere, including on smart contract wallets where the address is different on different chains.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

tomuky pfp
tomuky
@tomuky.eth
they don't have to with CCIP read/write
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Rahul Bhadoriya πŸŽ©β†‘ pfp
Rahul Bhadoriya πŸŽ©β†‘
@bhadoriya
Nope, we need Farcaster username everywhere
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ripndrug.cast pfp
ripndrug.cast
@ripndrug.eth
Absolutely yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction