Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth) pfp
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
Does ENS need to create its own L2 chain or nah? I want to use my .eth address everywhere.
28 replies
2 recasts
78 reactions
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
why are you thinking L2 chain for pure ENS? what would be the benefits? how would that make ens resolution available everywhere?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
chuckstock pfp
chuckstock
@chuckstock
sign in with farcaster :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dogan pfp
Dogan
@doganeth
We dont need ens L2 for this We already have CCIP read
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
No, but I think there should be some kind of CCIP cross chain protocol to share the info from the L1. Honestly, I’d even sign an L1 transaction if I could list all the addresses across chains I want to reverse record to my ENS.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
Your cast reads like it is implicit to not be able to use your ENS everywhere if they were to run their own chain. I am not sure why this would be the case. If they have technical reasons to run an L2 they should go ahead. I think their vision is to let ENS eat the world in any event.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Clamato pfp
Clamato
@clamato
Please no more L2ssssss
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
anon pfp
anon
@
Why don't you use it here yet?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
dyor pfp
dyor
@dyor.eth
Eh? Use it here...
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
fisherman.algo pfp
fisherman.algo
@fisherman
maybe checkout other naming services built on cheaper & faster rails? or just use one of their off-chain names if you cant afford ETH transactions anymore? creating an L2 just for a few contracts is insane lmao.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
👁️‍🗨️.eth pfp
👁️‍🗨️.eth
@address.eth
I mean your ability to use it everywhere is just a matter of platforms integrating ENS no? Don't see how an own L2 would help
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 pfp
0
@spyros80
Inevitable CDK chain -> AggLayer = ✅️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adrian DeFi pfp
Adrian DeFi
@adrian-defi
Yes please, I need new ENS addresses and ETH main net is way to expensive with all these ERC404 shenanigans going on
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Patrick pfp
Patrick
@patrickayelle.eth
Yes - If we have Universal synchronous composability.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
stycksintern pfp
stycksintern
@stycksintern.eth
I think ENS needs to make its own orbital L3 hyperchain SDK ICIP NSFW and then it’ll be fine
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sasha pfp
sasha
@sasha
personally I would prefer end users stop touching L1 at all, it’s too expensive.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
parkd pfp
parkd
@parkd.eth
Yes. I want to use it everywhere and pay less gas to buy others.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ChrisM pfp
ChrisM
@chrism333
It’s worth considering. In the future, the gas fees alone for registration (and renewals) at the L1 could become prohibitive. Now is the time to research.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ashinthewild pfp
Ashinthewild
@ashinthewild
why settle for an l2. they should go lx i mean its mathematically 5x better...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Salamander pfp
Salamander
@kemaihon
Agree
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction