Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan Sean Adams (rsa.eth)
@rsa.eth
Does ENS need to create its own L2 chain or nah? I want to use my .eth address everywhere.
13 replies
4 recasts
67 reactions
charlie
@chuckstock
sign in with farcaster :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel
@samuellhuber
why are you thinking L2 chain for pure ENS? what would be the benefits? how would that make ens resolution available everywhere?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
dyor
@hodler.eth
Eh? Use it here...
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dogan
@doganeth
We dont need ens L2 for this We already have CCIP read
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Thumbs Up π©
@thumbsup.eth
No, but I think there should be some kind of CCIP cross chain protocol to share the info from the L1. Honestly, Iβd even sign an L1 transaction if I could list all the addresses across chains I want to reverse record to my ENS.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MattwithouttheT π©ππ§Ύπ΅
@mathew
Does a separate L2 accomplish that?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max βπ©
@baseddesigner.eth
There are too many chains already man, time to get based for once
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rahul Bhadoriya π©β
@bhadoriya
Nope, we need Farcaster username everywhere
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ripndrug.degen.ethπ©πΉ
@ripndrug.eth
Absolutely yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
xh3b4sd β
@xh3b4sd.eth
Your cast reads like it is implicit to not be able to use your ENS everywhere if they were to run their own chain. I am not sure why this would be the case. If they have technical reasons to run an L2 they should go ahead. I think their vision is to let ENS eat the world in any event.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
