rish on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rish pfp

small experiment coming soon 👀

17 replies

4 recasts

50 reactions

Disky.eth 🎩 pfp

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

woj pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

kk pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

six pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Tiago pfp

@alvesjtiago.eth

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

tani pfp

yay! total connected addresses?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

antimo 🎩 pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Deployer pfp

I invite you to look at the FID storage contract on ham chain and potentially use it if it meets your requirements. There's an up to date mapping of FID to wallet addresses and vice versa. Created in collaboration with @syndicate https://explorer.ham.fun/address/0x709aaa2232A62992a3CD7C777F85DA972B5627BE?tab=read_contract

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Andrei O. pfp

Since UI is from block explorer this must be some contract. 194 is your fid, and because you can already resolve custody address to FID (with the original OP identity contract) it means that the address in screenshot is not custody address but a verification address that was published as verification message to hubs. So simple this is an on-chain resolver of verification addresses to FID. If my presumption is correct the method is wrong because it should return uint256[] instead of uint256 as the FC protocol allows a single address to be added as verified to multiple FIDs.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Rida pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Mai🖤 pfp

Hope it turns out bigger than you imagined.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jai pfp

I’m listening

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Abbas🎩👾 pfp

https://media.tenor.com/pgyX2KVUqSQAAAAC/woody-woody-toy-story.gif

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan pfp

what you cooking rish

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Luna✨🐈 pfp

👀what’s it about ??

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Noman🎩⚡ pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Aldi Russalam🎩 pfp

Aldi Russalam🎩

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction