Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
For me, the mint-fee is too low at the moment. I think the already low earlier Zora fee was great. Not as much as a latte so affordable, but still enough to engrain the idea that art has value into the minds of the wider public. Now we're back to Web2 mind-set of content is free. That's not a good thing.
4 replies
2 recasts
5 reactions
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
I think this is a very important point. It ingrains the idea that art has no worth. I understand that the price is based on a plan to have art more accessible to the masses that we all hope will one day join in but why is it always artists that have to pay this price? Everyone else involved gets their cut while artists have to play along in hopes of a payday some time in the future.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
But it’s not free. It’s $0.35.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
I’m not selling my photos for 30 cents. I’m arguably one of the best macro photographers in the world. So where do we go from here?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
this isn't how erc20s work though. if superrare had invented this token model instead of using 721s the platform would not only still be relevant but disgustingly profitable. if you are as good as you say you should crush the platform, but you aren't even willing to test it.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
What are you talking about? What am I not willing to test?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
zora's new protocol - am I wrong?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
Because I haven’t minted using Zora’s latest protocol you’re attacking me? I was actually referring to Rodeo and I’ve minted on Rodeo and bought a heap of work on there, I just haven’t minted my photography. I don’t think your tone was warranted nor do I think I need to justify my opinion. Are you ok?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
I should have just said "I think you'd crush on zora".I guess that phrasing has felt unmoving previously bc my opinion doesn't really matter, so I was trying to remove myself from it
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
My tone was lost in text while multitasking - I didn't intend any judgement nor did I intend to attack you and I sincerely apologize. My intended point behind "if you are as good as you say" was to challenge your assumption that the token model *can't* be profitable for you. I happen to agree with you, but that wasn't the point. I think you'd be surprised at how you'd perform on zora bc mechanically you're not selling your works for 30c in the way that you are on rodeo. It costs only 30c to contribute liquidity. Bc erc20s are as fungible, a better framework for zora than editions is shares - its just liquidity. At a minimum, bc tokens don't launch until after 200 mints, each work is valued at $60. I believe they'll raise that that threshold at some point, but needed to start low based on previous mint prices. While the minimum to participate is 30c, there is no upper limit. If zora forced folks to mint 10 editions for example (around prev mint price), people would view things much differently.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
