For me, the mint-fee is too low at the moment. I think the already low earlier Zora fee was great. Not as much as a latte so affordable, but still enough to engrain the idea that art has value into the minds of the wider public. Now we're back to Web2 mind-set of content is free. That's not a good thing.

A teller / of stories, that is me. / Curious to learn new ways to see. / Proud dad of two. Now, what / about you? | Builds https://paragraph.xyz/@trpplffct

I think this is a very important point. It ingrains the idea that art has no worth. I understand that the price is based on a plan to have art more accessible to the masses that we all hope will one day join in but why is it always artists that have to pay this price? Everyone else involved gets their cut while artists have to play along in hopes of a payday some time in the future.

Would your answer change if artwork was being minted in the tens of thousands instead of 10s or 100s like currently?

Award-winning fine art & documentary photographer 
































creator: /now • /portrait • /shakti •
https://linktr.ee/angelikakollin

💰 @angelikakollin has awarded 3 OP to anon for their response

0xf9ea5dedf2a66cd6907327667c8e096bfdda791bc6dbdc5693a8dd188eaa0521

💰 @angelikakollin has awarded 3 OP to anon for their response

0x407aef32cb646cc87cac9a2c7f9408885b6b5b5ee2fab0429400d1085f4d7547