For me, the mint-fee is too low at the moment. I think the already low earlier Zora fee was great. Not as much as a latte so affordable, but still enough to engrain the idea that art has value into the minds of the wider public. Now we're back to Web2 mind-set of content is free. That's not a good thing.

A teller / of stories, that is me. / Curious to learn new ways to see. / Proud dad of two. Now, what / about you? | Builds https://paragraph.xyz/@trpplffct

I think this is a very important point. It ingrains the idea that art has no worth. I understand that the price is based on a plan to have art more accessible to the masses that we all hope will one day join in but why is it always artists that have to pay this price? Everyone else involved gets their cut while artists have to play along in hopes of a payday some time in the future.

Reneecampbell.eth 

Reneecampbell.degen.eth

* https://bio.site/ReneeCampbell 

*  /flora 
* /reneecampbell 
* /base-australia

Creator of Worlds



Building @pkok | Art lover, Art collector | /pkok /pkokcurated /art-collectors

I’m not selling my photos for 30 cents. I’m arguably one of the best macro photographers in the world. So where do we go from here?