Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arjan | That Poetry Guy
@arjantupan
For me, the mint-fee is too low at the moment. I think the already low earlier Zora fee was great. Not as much as a latte so affordable, but still enough to engrain the idea that art has value into the minds of the wider public. Now we're back to Web2 mind-set of content is free. That's not a good thing.
4 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
I think this is a very important point. It ingrains the idea that art has no worth. I understand that the price is based on a plan to have art more accessible to the masses that we all hope will one day join in but why is it always artists that have to pay this price? Everyone else involved gets their cut while artists have to play along in hopes of a payday some time in the future.
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
But it’s not free. It’s $0.35.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
I’m not selling my photos for 30 cents. I’m arguably one of the best macro photographers in the world. So where do we go from here?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
this isn't how erc20s work though. if superrare had invented this token model instead of using 721s the platform would not only still be relevant but disgustingly profitable. if you are as good as you say you should crush the platform, but you aren't even willing to test it.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Renée Campbell 🎩
@reneecampbell
What are you talking about? What am I not willing to test?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
zora's new protocol - am I wrong?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
