potentially hot take is that nouns should have focused far more on product than media, and that would have spread the meme far more

Governance Public Utilities for @zksync at @thezknation

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

This is what I mean, there are no breakout “Noun” products that spread the meme enough. Like I think of what Basepaint did for Base and I wonder why that type of innovation hasn’t really happened with Nouns at the forefront.

Flows.wtf seems like a great recent example

A lot of exceptional builders created top physical products, but those products failed to Truly go beyond the ecosystem in the long term.

I think the issue is not the number of physical products created but the strategy and funding approach behind them.

The ability for small crypto apps to generate revenue quickly makes it such an interesting space to build an AI-enabled product studio. 

We've seen what happens as the cost of creating memecoins goes down by 100X — memeapps are next.

The other related opportunity is for chains/ecosystems to think about devrel differently. Instead of building for developers, they will create building blocks for roboagencies and AI-enabled studios/teams that want to launch an app a week.

The natural endpoint of course is for ecosystems to create their own version of Replit Agent and basically allow people to spin up new apps from a prompt, but creating quality products in that method is a ways off even for products outside of crypto.

Mundos y Personajes del Nouniverso 
Y otros mundos onchain

Nouns still can think as a media franchise

Assets and IP already exist so the community can make it using media franchise business models and strategies

That's our theory at @tayni-co

@quaestor Based on Rafa's perspective, what are your thoughts on Nouns Proposal 697?