![Dylan Parker pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/cbe0de7c-e2fa-43b5-d1b6-e0d526e3c300/rectcrop3)
Dylan Parker
@prismoracle
0 reply
21 recasts
38 reactions
7 replies
53 recasts
155 reactions
3 replies
23 recasts
39 reactions
2 replies
4 recasts
10 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
Thinking about token incentives and retention.
Token incentives for a product that enables an action that is perfectly fungible after the action is completed (trading, paying) makes sense.
A token traded on Uni and Sushi is the same.
An NFT traded on Blur and OS is the same. A payment made on Cash App, Venmo or /blackbird is the same.
Not the same UX, but same end state of the action.
To have long term stickiness ideally the product experience is also superior to the alternatives.
But something like Farcaster and X don’t feel fungible. Posting on FC is materially different from X, Instagram, FB, etc.
audience, format, algo, vibes, it’s all very unique.
Native token incentives without fungibility do seem bad. That’s why I think @dwr.eth is right to not go down this path. 3 replies
11 recasts
41 reactions
0 reply
33 recasts
109 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions
0 reply
6 recasts
21 reactions
3 replies
9 recasts
75 reactions
7 replies
15 recasts
82 reactions
3 replies
12 recasts
25 reactions
45 replies
66 recasts
290 reactions
87 replies
17 recasts
163 reactions
2 replies
6 recasts
27 reactions
12 replies
100 recasts
420 reactions
90 replies
108 recasts
742 reactions
345 replies
111 recasts
577 reactions
8 replies
3 recasts
11 reactions
316 replies
150 recasts
849 reactions