Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw βοΈπ©
@rjs
Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower? If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.
7 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
Pichi πͺππΉπ© π‘πΈ
@pichi
I see this consistently. Warpcast vs Airstack What grinds my gears is this community is hypersub gated. Bots donβt buy hypersubs. But about half my subscribers comments donβt make the cut.
5 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Ryan J. Shaw βοΈπ©
@rjs
How does that work - Warpcast filtering is impacting hypersub? Also: I probably still have an error somewhere -- you're seeing half the number of replies in WC vs. Airstack, whereas my typical reply numbers feel off by 10x in my analysis at least for me
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
C O M P Ξ Z
@compez.eth
There is a huge difference in the number of likes and recasts. I think WC ignores a lot of real stuff.
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Treborπ©π‘
@trebor69
Are you saying lots of real people who pay the hypersub get hidden too?π’
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
downshift
@downshift.eth
ooooof
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Esther βοΈ
@commin
Tysm
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
