Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower? If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.
7 replies
4 recasts
23 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I see this consistently. Warpcast vs Airstack What grinds my gears is this community is hypersub gated. Bots don’t buy hypersubs. But about half my subscribers comments don’t make the cut.
5 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Ryan J. Shaw Ⓜ️🎩
@rjs
How does that work - Warpcast filtering is impacting hypersub? Also: I probably still have an error somewhere -- you're seeing half the number of replies in WC vs. Airstack, whereas my typical reply numbers feel off by 10x in my analysis at least for me
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Yes. I can only see 118 replies in Warpcast. In other clients I can see more. So far, 131 people who own a paid Hypersub commented. So real humans are being hidden consistently. AirStack said 226 commented so far. Of course some are bots. But many are real and having a rough time.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
