Data

Do OG users get more engagement?

Yes but only for the really early users according to my probably buggy analysis... newer users actually seem to be getting the most analysis, please critique. I think bots could be distorting numbers a lot, I should probably throw out users with very high avgs >> 2 or 3x std dev?

https://dune.com/queries/4069970

Found a bug regarding follower counts: replies/follower is now dramatically different. Newer users actually get *better* engagement per follower than the old users - presumably the result of auto-follow diluting the value of each follower?

If you think these numbers seem way too high - you're not wrong. According to this, with my 20k followers I should get 160 replies on average to my cast, but I get maybe a 10th of that! My best guess is that this is because Warpcast hides a significant amount of replies to your casts (spam/low quality filtering) -- @pichi had documented this extensively. That or another bug in my analysis.

Pi-chi.eth (she/her) Artist /animeoutcasts
Purple Promoter|Tokyo DAO
Hosting: /moxietools /kyoto /sakura  /anime-manga /tokyotravel

https://beacons.ai/pi_chi

I see this consistently. 

Warpcast vs Airstack 

What grinds my gears is this community is hypersub gated. Bots don’t buy hypersubs. But about half my subscribers comments don’t make the cut.

Husband, dad, dev. @dune.eth wizard.

⭐ DEGEN Tips FAQ: https://paragraph.xyz/@rjs/degen-tips-ultimate-faq-v8 ⭐

Not financial advice. Not a KOL.

There is a huge difference in the number of likes and recasts. I think WC ignores a lot of real stuff.

Computer & Software Specialist /genyleap | Full-Stack Developer | Generative Artist | Author | Crypto, AI & NFT Enthusiast.

https://linktr.ee/compez

😥 you always do great analysis! thanks for doing everything in this regard man.

Hmm yeah looks like maybe 1/3rd reactions being accepted by WC and 1/2 the replies... Still my data predicting 5x more... Data analysis is hard 😭

Is there a plan to solve it? In this regard, I think I have seen a post before, but I can't find it!

Yeah. That’s 50%. This isn’t some margin of error.