Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better. "Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed. https://x.com/onnnnnnnion/status/1798215639389393214
5 replies
4 recasts
30 reactions

cyrus  pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
Appealing to who? Programmers?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
"Decentralization" may only appeal to cypherpunks.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cyrus  pfp
cyrus
@cyrus
馃挴 All of these terms are too niche and nerdy really
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

payeth馃帺馃數鉀擄笍馃崠馃寛 pfp
payeth馃帺馃數鉀擄笍馃崠馃寛
@payeth
Perhaps we should rebrand it as "web3 social" - it's a bit more relatable or intimidating, having attracted many intrigued individuals, even though no one can quite explain what it really is. 馃槀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction