Farcaster

I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better.

"Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed.

I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better.

"Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed.
https://x.com/onnnnnnnion/status/1798215639389393214

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

You're 100% in control of your public data on Farcaster.

DeFi Lead 🍏 Gains Network. Unfiltered takes—don’t take it too seriously.
談東論西 Podcast Host🧷 https://pods.media/coinversation



This is a great example. What I mean is that Farcaster is not as decentralized as other social media platforms like Nostr, but compared to centralized empires like Twitter, Farcaster clearly offers you more data sovereignty. At least, it won’t ban your account (clients can, but the Farcaster protocol itself cannot).

For me, what I find truly valuable about Farcaster is ownership of my social network and data.

My Chinese twitter acct was suspended 2 months ago without any rule violations on my part. Despite numerous appeals, 0 response. It was painful, to say the least. It marked the end of it for me with Twitter.

Design, art, nature and tech | cyrus.website |

"Decentralization" may only appeal to cypherpunks.

Con’t agree more. We need it. 100 $degen My Mr.Luo

Because of this feature, I'm happy to keep exploring it.