Farcaster

I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better.

"Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed.

I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better.

"Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed.
https://x.com/onnnnnnnion/status/1798215639389393214

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

Design, art, nature and tech | cyrus.website |

"Decentralization" may only appeal to cypherpunks.

Perhaps we should rebrand it as "web3 social" - it's a bit more relatable or intimidating, having attracted many intrigued individuals, even though no one can quite explain what it really is. 😂

💯
All of these terms are too niche and nerdy really