Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
I agree "programmable social" fits Farcaster better. "Decentralization" isn't as appealing since FC doesn't offer true data ownership. "Programmable Social" effectively conveys its blockchain integration, like how Frames enable onchain interactions in the Feed. https://x.com/onnnnnnnion/status/1798215639389393214
5 replies
4 recasts
30 reactions
cyrus
@cyrus
Appealing to who? Programmers?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
"Decentralization" may only appeal to cypherpunks.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cyrus
@cyrus
馃挴 All of these terms are too niche and nerdy really
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
Perhaps we should rebrand it as "web3 social" - it's a bit more relatable or intimidating, having attracted many intrigued individuals, even though no one can quite explain what it really is. 馃槀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
payeth馃帺馃數鉀擄笍馃崠馃寛
@payeth
Perhaps we should rebrand it as "web3 social" - it's a bit more relatable or intimidating, having attracted many intrigued individuals, even though no one can quite explain what it really is. 馃槀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
