Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
should we add a condition where a noun has to season for at least 6 months before it is able to join the fork? shouldn't really harm honest minority protection.
11 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
we're coordinating to accelerate spend with the burn etc but it's still taking some time. would be a shame for arbitrageurs to spam the auction for the next 3-6 months (since we don't get new dao members + we don't get true price discovery which is valuable).
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨ pfp
Toady Hawk 🟡 ⌐◨-◨
@toadyhawk.eth
Cast Iron Nouns
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Davin クマ pfp
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
oops! I thought the honest minority is who the fork was engineered for 🙏🏽
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Conflicted on this. Definitely agree in vesting for gifted nouns from treasury. But a little odd to restrict rights to a property someone buys. But also agree that I’d like to stop the churn of auction>>fork. Hence the conflict. https://warpcast.com/nounishprof/0x6967283c
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
supriyo pfp
supriyo
@supriyo.eth
yes please. Seasoning / Aging whatever you could call it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
+1
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Coralorca pfp
Coralorca
@coralorca
I like that that. 6 months. Sounds about right. You can still sell if you really want out.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
RobotFishGirl pfp
RobotFishGirl
@robotfishgirl
Absolutely. I'd actually favor this over the burn mechanism- I think it'd accomplish at least one of the main goals
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben pfp
Ben
@jarmen
I said this to elad last week
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
billzh pfp
billzh
@billzh
Great idea. This would immediately allow non-arb new members to join, which is something we need
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
The truth here is that either way ultimately the exit protection is self-invalidating under v3. It has to be constrained, either through vesting, caps, burn, wev, until it’s a rounding error. Fwiw, a 6 mo vest is nowhere enough to mitigate the option value on its own if historical Noun spending rate is used.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction