w-g pfp

w-g

@w-g

15 Following
171 Followers
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
the artist
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
@krel any specific pointers on what makes prop feel drafty? Guess needs a 5th rewrite lol or if others are confused about anything? (might be first case of a third party attempting to fund another team w/o coordination ?) https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/stake-1k-in-rounds-32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
@zeroweight !sponsor stake 1k in rounds
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
if interested in giga-funding rounds &/or improving odds of a liquid $nouns token launch, consider reading this candidate ty https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/stake-1k-in-rounds-32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
DISTRIBUTE THE VETO ¯■¯◨ cred: @coralorca
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
1/2 there’s a pure economics argument for delaying $nouns to eoy. The dominant perspective in the market is that we are in for a sleepy summer wrt inflows, and that a second wave of Bitcoin buying & possible eth etf approval a few months down the road may align to drive better engagement with new products:
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
all the saltiness around prop 531 reminds me of prop 15- the proposal I’m most proud of since it reminds me of an idealistic time where I believed the merits (or lack) of the transactions might speak for themselves. Now I campaign all the time but miss the person that wrote this https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/15
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Nouniverse poll: Are you planning on LPing $nouns? At what starting price? Don’t all raise your hand at once. if a fork 3 occurs I am afaict the only possible meaningful seed liquidity for this thing continue to scratch my head over why my perspective on how to do it properly is not being more actively sought
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Electric
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Helpful framing. 100eth says this is wrong, and that it won’t be close. Also throwing in that bids will be more liquid on nft mkt vs LP for free. If we have a bet I may even vote FOR 🫠
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
3 concerns the ‘fungibilization’ of treasury nouns (the swap/auction proposal is far less bad in this dimension and that had strong opposition) as a vehicle for speculation is non-accretive (solvable by allowing only dao to mint & issue as rewards) w/o governance rights or POW to own, how is this not a security?
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/528 Gm A question to consider over ☕️ what protection would you prefer if bringing all you are custodian/guardian/shepherd of into Nouns? which would you extend to friends/guests in your home?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
!sponsor Spec and Economic Audit of Alternate Forking Mechanics (incl % Exit) @zeroweight
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Assuming the noun ask will not meaningfully impact vote direction? https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/exploring-novel-treasury-allocation-mechanisms-for-nouns-32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
‘Idea’ Nouns round? Is there appetite among noundry artists for a contest round focused on conceptual noun traits (esp heads)? Things like ‘Emergence,’ ‘Charm’ etc. If so, is it more interesting to be constrained on specific prompts or better to leave open (as long as the noun is acorporeal)
2 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Thrilled to see retro, inclusive and native token denominated allocation grow and become mainstream nouns ideas Sad to hear there is no L2 backend onchain piece planned to execute the txes - don’t think this scales in the way we want (and becomes harder to systematize) without someone working on this part. Step up!
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
dynamic quorum been showing out lately! also, its a good reminder that voting *no* in our world is serious business.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
Is there any upside in opening the floodgates a bit to noundry/new traits admission? One route would be to add rarity vectors that could be determined by degree of support for each trait. imo There’s something interesting in not delineating the art by simple majority.. what if your tastes deviate from the hive?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
would really appreciate some feedback on this candidate to do a comparative audit of % exit vs current system. this prop offers a path to permanently end to the anon auction era https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/exploring-novel-treasury-allocation-mechanisms-for-nouns-32d1a53f6709a03f4b6cf4cb0501204ba188d4f5
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
w-g pfp
w-g
@w-g
hevy heds🤝 @zeroweight
4 replies
1 recast
9 reactions