Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
interested to know where ppl think the majority of the pullback on remote is coming from seems like two main areas to me, the 'startups need to be in person' narrative out of some of the core old-school SV / SF ppl and Elon
9 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
justin.framedl.eth
@ahn.eth
imo, remote setups work best if/when your foundations (vision, objectives, execution skills, etc.) are strong, which is often not the case for startups fwiw, my own company is remote; and while there are benefits (cost savings, higher quality of life), i do think we'd be more effective business wise in-person
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Adam
@adam-
I’ve heard of companies that have found a good middle ground where they balance running a remote team with mandatory retreats once or twice a year. Personal connections are fostered while allowing for employees to work around their schedules.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
i think this is the optimal model!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Adam
@adam-
While there’s no “on size fits all” approach, I do think there’s a lack of communication and curiosity in seeking out better ways to make remote work, work. Instead you have people forcing others to go back to a way that doesn’t fit within the direction the world is going.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
yep!!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
It's amazing to me that the companies boasting "world-class" teams require every day onsite. Like...no. Unless they're covering relocation costs and childcare.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Poison Ivy
@ivy
properly having a remote first startup requires some changes in how a company does things that some aren't willing to do which like fine but it's a huge leap to 'remote is inherently bad / inferior'
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
