Mozhik Kovalski
@mozhikkrolinski
52 replies
49 recasts
270 reactions
24 replies
130 recasts
348 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
31 replies
27 recasts
155 reactions
6 replies
5 recasts
47 reactions
58 replies
23 recasts
242 reactions
114 replies
26 recasts
165 reactions
57 replies
15 recasts
177 reactions
8 replies
25 recasts
125 reactions
4 replies
5 recasts
55 reactions
8 replies
15 recasts
104 reactions
My post from 1.5 years about "assessing demand drivers for ETH" had the line "Needless to say, we’ll need to wait for EIP-4844 to assess this."
Now that EIP-4844 is out for half a year, it's indeed time to do so. As such, I'd downgrade the significance of "L2 fee burns" from 2/10 to 1/10. While it's very likely demand for blobspace is gradually going up, supply is up even more with PeerDAS imminent, plus full sharding & Nielsen's Law making blob count up only. Cross-L2 interoperability has also been much less required than anticipated, as most users are happy to stick to their chosen L2, or bridge between only occasionally
So, why was I (mildly) wrong? I did not fully understand the concept of strict global consensus then, which I only wrote about in depth later in 2023. With a better grasp of the true demand landscape for blobspace, the 1/10 is obvious
Also, this is great for Ethereum/ETH in the same way as building public roads
https://polynya.mirror.xyz/GPC26Y_rlwCyPpj_N3HeW_izY1-pIVwKW5bjuPNrGeQ 27 replies
29 recasts
159 reactions
4 replies
6 recasts
47 reactions
11 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
