Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
matthewb
@matthewb
interesting dynamic with warpcast rewards where veteran participants might not follow or engage much with a new account that rockets to the top 10 along the lines of "they don't need more engagement!" this keeps their follower count low—or lower than it would otherwise be—which effectively gives them a multiplier on their score since it's follower count adjusted
7 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
Listen I’m just trying to not turn into a total @leefang reply guy. It’s getting embarrassing for me
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer
do you think top accounts intentionally don't interact with new people based on them being new?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
horsefacts 🚂
@horsefacts.eth
hater behavior
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
bertwurst
@bertwurst.eth
shhh...I would rather have $100 than the snobby veterans engagement (disclaimer: not all veterans are this way, a lot of you are very very nice)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jtgi
@jtgi
likes are zero sum now
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs
@trigs
The meta takeaway here is that to minimax your reward potential you want to mass-follow everyone to dilute their score, but never engage with their content directly; only QC it to drive engagement to yourself. Lol which is exactly the opposite of what I do. I rarely follow ppl, but engage fully through channels with everything interesting to me. Which is reflected in my score 🤷
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
I don’t think I’ve followed anyone based on rewards because I don’t check rewards and I don’t think their bangers are showing up in my feed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
