Trigs pfp

Trigs

@trigs

394 Following
622 Followers
Trigs pfp
0 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions
Trigs pfp
3 replies
2 recasts
6 reactions
Trigs pfp
I really like this one. I've said this for years! Urban life would be drastically improved if we had more common spaces in neighborhoods. Parks are a perfect example. Proximity to a park can be a sloppy 20% on home value. <FYI we're calling it "sloppy" when you quick AI confirm something you just made up> There are quite a few community garden areas in my local town, but that's pretty rare, even here. We also have a few makers type spaces where you can go and use or even rent to take home different tools. Every neighborhood could have a few shops with various tools and a decentralized and autonomous structure around managing their use and maintenance! Or a public kitchen space for people to collaborate on combining garden yield to create large batches of specific preserved foods to share, maximizing the efficiency of each individual contribution. The space could double as an event space for the community, much like many HOA communities have today. If only there was a way to self organize...
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Trigs pfp
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Trigs pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Trigs pfp
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Trigs pfp
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Trigs pfp
0 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Trigs pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Trigs pfp
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Trigs pfp
4 replies
1 recast
13 reactions
Trigs pfp
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Trigs pfp
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Trigs pfp
Question about thread replies and how ranking works. I love that we can just + to add more casts to make a thread. I hate that replies by default stack on the top level post and bury the rest of the thread. - do replies only boost ranking if they are on the top level cast of a thread? - could threads default to adding comments to the last cast in the thread? - could you aggregate likes and replies from the entire thread? Like if 1 person likes all 5 casts in the thread it's only 1 factor of boost. But if 5 ppl like any of the casts in the thread it counts as a factor of 5 instead of just however many were on the top cast? Don't want to make threads overpowered, but rather just stop punishing them with bad UX. Making threads more accessible would greatly improve deeper exploration into topics, imo.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Trigs pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trigs pfp
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Trigs pfp
One topic I wanted to double-click on was one @thethriller brought up around the skin-in-the-game concept for voting and the potential for slashing/losing if you're wrong. I really appreciated his point about how some individuals contribute meaningful value to a governance topic without necessarily having a very strongly held opinion about the outcome. I think this is an opportunity space that is ripe for exploration! I love @1a35e1's project Signals because I think its addressing this from one perspective. I also think that @nor's Negation game is playing in this space as well. What do ya'lls think about this in regards to mechanisms to engage people in the governance process that is separated from the actual funding allocation process (which is where the skin-in-the-game topic came up)? What other projects are exploring this opportunity space?
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Trigs pfp
3 replies
2 recasts
7 reactions