martin ↑
@martin
been thinking about a few options here: 1. One time retro fund 2. Hypersub as main “Aether Development Fund” (includes tech costs) 3. Go to another group (ie Higher Party, Nouns, OP / Base Grants) for funding
9 replies
1 recast
36 reactions
six
@six
retro fund from aether, retro fund from higher collective, and then hypersub for continued development. but i kinda agree with phil's original point on some sort of % split from aether's wallet for incentive alignment. e.g. you "founded" aether, so you have some equity as a founder
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Symbiotech⌐◨-◨🟡🎩テ
@symbiotech.eth
all of the above
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
McBain
@mcbain
One time isn't good enough You're going to have to pay taxes on what Aether makes, I'm sorry to say, so you should share in their revenue
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
I think a mix of both. Can set the Hypersub as a splits contract too so your incentives are aligned
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tomu
@tomu.eth
agree with six and mark, having a stake in aether and hypersub as continued revenue
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
jihad ↑
@jihad
All 3
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
colfax
@clfx.eth
1 + 2 + [% of earnings from mints etc.] 3 seems unnecessary if 1+2 are enacted
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
antaur ↑
@antaur.eth
yes to all the above - and - you could be bolder and ask Merkle for some fund bc this is a net positive for farcaster imho
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gramajo👽
@gramajo.eth
All 3 tio, right now this rocket needs to keep going higher!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction