
法老
@lao
4 replies
0 recast
41 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
6 replies
0 recast
30 reactions
8 replies
6 recasts
85 reactions
24 replies
33 recasts
235 reactions
10 replies
4 recasts
57 reactions
11 replies
17 recasts
92 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
3 replies
2 recasts
21 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
13 replies
4 recasts
19 reactions
9 replies
7 recasts
53 reactions
30 replies
12 recasts
39 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
19 reactions
39 replies
21 recasts
59 reactions
15 replies
3 recasts
33 reactions
30 replies
17 recasts
40 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
This was probably inevitable.
Closed systems like Telegram typically become less open over time. I have seen this play out over and over at other opaque, centralized messaging services.
Hell, I came from this world - of course this is how it would play out.
-> If transparency matters, you shouldn't use Telegram.
-> If permissionless building matters, you shouldn't use Telegram.
-> If privacy & security matter, you shouldn't use Telegram.
Transparency and openness must be baked in from inception, ideally at the protocol level, otherwise developers can get rugged at any time.
XMTP is designed from the ground up to be a stable, reliable, and open platform for developers to build their best messaging use cases.
It’s time to build on foundations not owned by a single person or company.
Join us in building XMTP, the world's secure, decentralized messaging network. 0 reply
12 recasts
25 reactions