Kyle McCollom
@kyle
was just pitched uber but decentralized. i thought we had moved past this.
9 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
Yassine Landa
@yassinelanda.eth
Past what? Trying to create better aligned and more resilient orgs/companies? Innovating and pushing boundaries? Daring to try?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
this is a good idea and should be built. there's no reason why drivers and riders shouldn't own the network they use to transport. and the technology is good enough to make it possible.
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
rish
@rish
so back
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jayme Hoffman
@jayme
what did they call it?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
thoughtcrimeboss
@thoughtcrimeboss
In exchange for taking some earnings I would imagine uber protects you from the myriad of laws that try to prevent independents from driving. They had the money to fight all the government nonsense city by city whereas a decentralized app would need to be more creative. Unless their token moons 2 pay the lawyers lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nick Ducoff
@stoic
This exists on solana called teleport and they’re doing great
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Henry Hirshland
@hirsh
What part(s) of this idea are dumb?
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
drew fagin 🌊
@drews.eth
the whole ‘migration’ to mastodon time made me think about federated rider-share systems eg cities could adopt the protocol as an alternative option. would probably be a shit show but interesting civil tech concept
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Bradvani
@bradvani
DeTelcom is more the hour of the need. In order to secure the internet and global communications system. Love to hear when someone pitches something like that.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
