Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
use typescript they said https://github.com/TanStack/router/blob/main/packages/react-router/src/link.tsx
17 replies
28 recasts
200 reactions

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
these ternaries remind me of pure fp haskell or lisps
0 reply
0 recast
19 reactions

Kevin pfp
Kevin
@typedarray.eth
Now show us what user/editor experience this powers ;)
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Nick T pfp
Nick T
@nt
So well-typed it broke the GitHub formatter:
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wijuwiju.eth (mopzy.eth) pfp
wijuwiju.eth (mopzy.eth)
@wijuwiju.eth
I think there should be an 18+ dangerous material warning overlay for these images
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sean Brennan pfp
Sean Brennan
@seanwbren
obfuscated code for sure
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nicholas Charriere pfp
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
Weirdly readable though
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

downshift pfp
downshift
@downshift.eth
oof...regrets? would you use something else?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

timdaub pfp
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
Whatβ€˜s the actual explanation here for using a type over checking a value at run time?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noah Bragg πŸ”₯ pfp
Noah Bragg πŸ”₯
@nbragg
Yeah, I don't like that. lol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matt pfp
Matt
@hughassle.eth
Wtf
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noah pfp
Noah
@novakx
TypeScript: where even the types need their own roadmap
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Robotandkid  pfp
Robotandkid
@robotandkid
using it in a library is different than using it in an app. In an app, you can get away w/ basic types + a handful of advanced features. Libraries are another story. But IMO engineers tend to over engineer so would have never allowed that
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dmytro pfp
Dmytro
@dmytryk
Looks weird 😬 bet they don't know who is Robert Martin πŸ˜€
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

segwitnitwit pfp
segwitnitwit
@segwitnitwit
well glad that's well defined! πŸ˜†
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Barbatosalan pfp
Barbatosalan
@barbatosalan
good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

flick the dev πŸŽ©πŸ“¦ pfp
flick the dev πŸŽ©πŸ“¦
@flick
fancy 512 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction