Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
Sendit ↗ action (mvp) is here + Deploy any media cast to @zora + Creator rewards (ether) to caster + Create referral rewards to /sendit + First minter rewards to actioneer + Mint referral rewards for sharing Positive-sum piracy on @base Encouraging casters to mint Built w. @undefined <3 https://go.sendit.city
40 replies
7 recasts
99 reactions

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
does this mean anyone can easily mint our work? Am I understanding this correctly?
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
yes. but it sets the creator rewards portion of zora protocol rewards to the original caster. idea is to make creators stop and think "should i mint this" before casting. inspired heavily by this manifesto i wrote about 6 months ago https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x5b8c0d2cdf985bd5521b9dc944a535bdd3a8259d/1
8 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Maria Fynsk Norup 🎩🔵 pfp
Maria Fynsk Norup 🎩🔵
@mariafynsknorup.eth
Very sketchy and illegal to mint other people’s work without consent! 🤯
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
we're experimenting with this concept: onchain is the new online. when someone shares your work online, you get exposure. imagine they're sharing it onchain and you get exposure, and money. it's not claiming ownership, nor trying to impersonate the original. it's simply another means of distribution and monetary reward
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
Nobody pays their bills with exposure. It would be very serious ethical concern for artwork that was already minted and sold. If I sold a piece for 2eth, my collector would be pissed if it turns into a free mint, it would completely devalue my work.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
could certainly devalue your work, if you, the artist, decided to remint your work and sell it again, or give away for free. but that's not what we're experimenting with. simply another method of curation, for socially shared content, through which enjoyers support artists, while partaking in culture around their work
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
i get your concerns, especially as an artist myself, but this isn't an attack on artists, it's an artistic expression of my own that's informed by years as an onchain creator. i've experimented a lot as one of the top creators on zora. my weekly /enjoy tipping allowance reflects that and i'm enjoying tipping artists
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Joelle LB  pfp
Joelle LB
@joellelb
Sorry but I don't think your weekly Enjoy tipping allowance has any weight in such a serious legal issue. I'm all about ppl building & experimenting on here, but this is a copyright concern and is completely illegal. Hope you figure out a way for artists to be in control of their own work on the blockchain.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

呂丹冊工 pfp
呂丹冊工
@gami
the tool is first and foremost for artists. the original creators of the works. i mean, it's putting minting at your fingertips. yes sure, people could use it to mint other people's work, as they can with any nft minting tool in existence. but it's in no way attempting to forge, counterfeit, or claim your copyrights.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction