gami.eth on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gami.eth pfp

Sendit ↗ action (mvp) is here + Deploy any media cast to @zora + Creator rewards (ether) to caster + Create referral rewards to /sendit + First minter rewards to actioneer + Mint referral rewards for sharing Positive-sum piracy on @base Encouraging casters to mint Built w. @undefined <3 https://go.sendit.city

39 replies

7 recasts

87 reactions

Joelle LB pfp

does this mean anyone can easily mint our work? Am I understanding this correctly?

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

gami.eth pfp

yes. but it sets the creator rewards portion of zora protocol rewards to the original caster. idea is to make creators stop and think "should i mint this" before casting. inspired heavily by this manifesto i wrote about 6 months ago https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x5b8c0d2cdf985bd5521b9dc944a535bdd3a8259d/1

7 replies

0 recast

0 reaction

Maria Fynsk Norup 🎩🔵 pfp

Maria Fynsk Norup 🎩🔵

@mariafynsknorup.eth

Very sketchy and illegal to mint other people’s work without consent! 🤯

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

gami.eth pfp

we're experimenting with this concept: onchain is the new online. when someone shares your work online, you get exposure. imagine they're sharing it onchain and you get exposure, and money. it's not claiming ownership, nor trying to impersonate the original. it's simply another means of distribution and monetary reward

3 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Joelle LB pfp

Nobody pays their bills with exposure. It would be very serious ethical concern for artwork that was already minted and sold. If I sold a piece for 2eth, my collector would be pissed if it turns into a free mint, it would completely devalue my work.

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

gami.eth pfp

could certainly devalue your work, if you, the artist, decided to remint your work and sell it again, or give away for free. but that's not what we're experimenting with. simply another method of curation, for socially shared content, through which enjoyers support artists, while partaking in culture around their work

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gami.eth pfp

i get your concerns, especially as an artist myself, but this isn't an attack on artists, it's an artistic expression of my own that's informed by years as an onchain creator. i've experimented a lot as one of the top creators on zora. my weekly /enjoy tipping allowance reflects that and i'm enjoying tipping artists

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Joelle LB pfp

Sorry but I don't think your weekly Enjoy tipping allowance has any weight in such a serious legal issue. I'm all about ppl building & experimenting on here, but this is a copyright concern and is completely illegal. Hope you figure out a way for artists to be in control of their own work on the blockchain.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gami.eth pfp

the tool is first and foremost for artists. the original creators of the works. i mean, it's putting minting at your fingertips. yes sure, people could use it to mint other people's work, as they can with any nft minting tool in existence. but it's in no way attempting to forge, counterfeit, or claim your copyrights.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gami.eth pfp

i never said my tipping allowance had anything to do with legalities. that was to demonstrate that i'm an artist who has been one of the most active, and collected, onchain creators on zora. i want you to know i'm not here to exploit artists. i am one. the manifesto inspired the experiment. it's not advocating piracy.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction