0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
100 replies
47 recasts
275 reactions
3 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
3 recasts
17 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
18 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
4 replies
4 recasts
28 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
17 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
it wasn't best choice imho , good on you for changing your mind
but , we have 2 kind of problems here
first one is multi account farming , right ?
We can make up for this issue with a scoring system. For example, every account should earn points based on different criteria to stay in the tipping game. Like: account age, activity level, open rank, number of followers, follower quality, having an active and aged Twitter account, wallet activity on Base or Solana networks, and so on. Each of these can have its own points, and we can set a minimum score to approve accounts for the tipping game 2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

It has to be a combo of hard data and manual correction. But coupled with education and guidance.
Hard data alone does not count in the human factor. Wave 1 of bans (channels, ring leaders and accs that tip ring leaders 3x) was solid but needed some correction for false positives. Doing everything manually aka dedegen style is hard manual labor (don't ask how I know) and people will get around it by doing multiple accs or expanding the ring.
Using all sets of data (e.g. spam label of 0, open score, neynar, what @burrrrrberry mentioned about combining different banned users from diff protocols etc) as a starter, trying to understand the impact before the commit, and then seeing what went wrong is how I would try to do it (without having any code knowledge whatsoever).
Also, @deployer has a great 2 part method for hams. 1) if you withdraw over daily allo, an allo until you get tipped that amount and 2) tip more than your allo, it goes from your own funds. Not saying "copy that", but just sth to consider. 1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction