0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
83 replies
55 recasts
274 reactions
It has to be a combo of hard data and manual correction. But coupled with education and guidance.
Hard data alone does not count in the human factor. Wave 1 of bans (channels, ring leaders and accs that tip ring leaders 3x) was solid but needed some correction for false positives. Doing everything manually aka dedegen style is hard manual labor (don't ask how I know) and people will get around it by doing multiple accs or expanding the ring.
Using all sets of data (e.g. spam label of 0, open score, neynar, what @burrrrrberry mentioned about combining different banned users from diff protocols etc) as a starter, trying to understand the impact before the commit, and then seeing what went wrong is how I would try to do it (without having any code knowledge whatsoever).
Also, @deployer has a great 2 part method for hams. 1) if you withdraw over daily allo, an allo until you get tipped that amount and 2) tip more than your allo, it goes from your own funds. Not saying "copy that", but just sth to consider. 1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
