Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia
@giu
Interesting chart showing types of food, their cost and protein percentage
11 replies
1 recast
41 reactions
JAKE
@jake
Interesting, but would be more useful imo if the x-axis was per 100 calories as opposed to per 100 grams of food. Also, I’m not sure how accurate this data is. For example, chicken breast (31) appears to have more grams of protein per 100 grams of food than peanuts (25). Screenshots below from calorie tracking app:
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
team cow's milk for the win... for those who can digest it, its a really solid nutritional part of the diet. great source of calcium and phosphorous, and a decent source of magnesium and potassium. whole milk all the better, for the quality fats. from pastured grass fed cows if you make the room in your budget.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Diego
@d1ego
Nice graph! Surprised about the stark difference between Pork Chop and Pork Belly on the x axis.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yangwao ↑
@yangwao
Comes to my mind what I thought earlier. Good protein low/no sugar granola is still underrated thing.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Warpmaster General
@my
Bioavailability is a huge missing component in this chart. Amount of protein that can be readily absorbed is crucial
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Harri Jay
@harri
Doesn't appear to take bioavailability into account. Legumes aren't nearly as easily digested and utilized than (all/most?) animal-based proteins.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
billyTRILLions
@billyshipp
So like, what’s up with legumes then? Like how did that happen?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zzz
@bonfireblythe
now how do i get this in a higher res 🤔
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zach
@zachwill
Garbanzo beans rule everything round me!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
