Gabriel Ayuso pfp
Gabriel Ayuso
@gabrielayuso.eth
I've heard many podcasts and read many posts that describe the need for this yet not with blockchains and crypto. I don't get ignoring technology that is perfectly suitable for this just because it's been used for things that you don't like or agree with. It's like not wanting to use AI because it can be used for deep fakes or not wanting to use nuclear power because it can be used to make nuclear weapons.
6 replies
3 recasts
15 reactions

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
Crypto in the cryptocurrency sense generally tends to get conflated with block chain, and speaking candidly, block chain does not handle large app scale. Consider iMessage, 2016 era. 200k messages per second, and only increased since then, but no new public figures exist. No block chain can offer 200k raw transactions per second, and the ones that claim they do are sacrificing to the point of being effectively centralized (e.g. a validator set size of 10)
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Timur Badretdinov pfp
Timur Badretdinov
@destiner
he’s right you don’t need a blockchain to create /obsidian
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Without more regulatory clarity it's just too much of a risk for most companies to invest heavily into. Fine for an innovation team, but big enterprises (who are also customers) aren't going to want to touch it until they have a better understanding of where the industry is heading.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
It’s not because they don’t agree with some uses. Half of them have a beef for missing out and the rest are afraid it’s not cool.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 56 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tudor 🟣🟡 Engineer to fCTO pfp
Tudor 🟣🟡 Engineer to fCTO
@tudorizer
Controversies of blockchain speculations aside, there are quite a few examples where simply slapping a “on-chain” label on a service is not ideal. Quite a few companies have gotten away with it. Store data on-chain when/if it makes sense, no? It’s what makes sense about “sufficiently decentralized” too.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction