Dan Romero on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp

PSA about the new version of channels 1. They're no longer single topics / hashtags. We tried hashtags for a year and they didn't work. There's no canonical /food channel anymore. Instead, there will be many smaller groups about a topic. 2. The best way to think about the new version of channels — a text-based Twitter Space. There's a group of people (members) "on stage" who can post new stuff in the channel, and a larger group in the "audience". However, anyone in the audience can reply and get discovered / invited to the channel. We've improved how replies work (and making it easy to invite from replies) in the last 24 hours. 3. Casting in your home feed, i.e. no channel, will give you just as much distribution in the algo. We have not been boosting casts from channels you follow but people you don't follow for a while. The results were too inconsistent. 4. Our next big focus will be onboarding new users directly to channels when joining Farcaster.

16 replies

8 recasts

80 reactions

meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3 pfp

meta-david🎩 | Building Scoop3

Thanks for the explanation on the call. I didn’t understand before when you said “they didn’t work,” but I have a better understanding of intent/outcome now.

2 replies

0 recast

7 reactions

adrienne pfp

I like the analogy but it will be interesting how it plays out given Twitter spaces are ephemeral, channels are long running Keep rockin 👏

1 reply

0 recast

8 reactions

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸 pfp

Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸

Does the algo favor text over images and frames?

1 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Eddie Wharton pfp

If hypothesis true, wouldn’t there have been success cases in old channels? Flexible mod tools and 90/9/1 made it possible, this just changes the default Appreciate the experiment either way

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Ray 🎩 pfp

@0xgymleader.eth

i know it's probably too soon to tell but how things looking so far? i like the changes for the most part. yall have the green light to begin decentralizing channels yet?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Drip pfp

I don’t understand point 1. Like you can’t make “too simple” channels anymore? Are you saying /food will cease to exist?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

helladj™ pfp

1.what 2.what 3.ok that makes sense 4.what

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Meg pfp

@meganmichelle.eth

2 feels off to me.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Galen @Gnosis 🦉 pfp

Galen @Gnosis 🦉

Nice! This should unlock some pretty direct interest-graph acquisition tactic. Is there a public channel that discusses how to grow Farcaster? Make the collective strategy-making public / spectacle.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

kompreni 🅱️ ⚡ pfp

kompreni 🅱️ ⚡

Re #1: does that mean channels no longer live in a unique namespace? Eg there can be two channels with /food ?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Paul Cowgill pfp

re: 3, there were inconsistent results with the old version of channels. maybe with the new version, the results would be different? i’d like to have a reason to keep following new channels

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

tim/vortac pfp

Have you ever thought about an additional meta-categorization system for channels? That could possibly make it easier to find relevant content in a group of thematically related channels? In addition to being a follower or member of one or more of these channels, you could “subscribe” to topic-based tags and then follow an entire cluster of channels directly or indirectly. I am particularly interested in (digital) art topics. What I painfully noticed again in the course of the channel changeover, when I sent out invites for /the-library and went through the follower list, was how many artists have left FC again, many of whom I also brought on board at the time. I think that the fragmentation of the art channels is part of the problem and I often ask myself in which channel I should best place the post so that it gets the most visibility. You get the feeling that a lot of information gets lost and doesn't reach enough recipients because it's not bundled.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

whimsi goose pfp

@whimsicott.eth

4 is big and was the only ‘concern’ i had to the new channel system (for new users) this cooking is too bullish

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

0x pfp

just logged in after months and this was the first change I noticed. Thanks for explaining!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Perry🎩 pfp

@collectorscanyon.eth

Step 4 sounds satisfying

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Ethan666.eth🎩🍖🔵🧾🟣 pfp

Ethan666.eth🎩🍖🔵🧾🟣

Sir I really miss being able to cast my dishes and recipes in the /food it’s my top 5 favorite channel to use.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction