Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I’ll double down on my original prediction: Threads is a dud.
30 replies
15 recasts
135 reactions

andrei pfp
andrei
@andreitr.eth
My hunch is that Threads is here to stay. I think the ability to import an existing social graph is huge - better feed, better recs, etc. In my first 10 minutes on the platform I re-connected with friends who never made it to Twitter. Also, integrations with other fediverse platforms has a lot of potential.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
I don’t think so. It has potential to dethrone Twitter now that Elon started f*cking with it by limiting users how much tweets they can see, etc. I’m officially bearish Twitter for the first time since I joined back in 2009.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
Why do you think it’s a dud? It feels like more of the same to me, but what’s your reasoning?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️ pfp
nir.eth 🌿🟣🐦☁️
@nir
I’m not sure about that
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
I’d say it’s an instant success right now. What determines if it survives is what they optimize the feed around, and how much control they give to users to configure their feed. If it stays as a bunch of 20m+ follower influencers saying vapid things I don’t think it will last
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Connor McCormick pfp
Connor McCormick
@nor
make it more precise and I'll make a market
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

​woj — q/dau pfp
​woj — q/dau
@woj.eth
wrong
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Kyle pfp
Kyle
@kalelabs.eth
If this ends up being wrong, why do you think that is? What priors does it update for you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Minh Do pfp
Minh Do
@minh
How do we define dud? I think what’s interesting to me about the potential of Threads is how they might handle virality. If they have some drama or viral moments that are worth reporting on beyond the fact that they are growing, that’s when maybe it steals the limelight from Twitter.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Murdo pfp
Murdo
@murdo
Curious, do you think Mastodon and / or Bluesky are duds?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
*Thuds*
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Aaina  pfp
Aaina
@aaina
threads is for people who aren’t hot enough to be instagram queens and who aren’t intellectual or productive enough to be twitter kings trying to combine the mid leverage they have between the two to foster relevance. in that way it feels like an unimaginative and extractive social factory for clout chasers.
11 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
I didn’t even bother the download, and am already annoyed with Twitter only talking about it.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Max Miner pfp
Max Miner
@mxmnr
Agreed. Like you said: https://twitter.com/dwr/status/1676787860433690625?s=46&t=kbUluqkrtSAIaGiJXuXVAw
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eunika🍒 pfp
eunika🍒
@eunika.eth
The problem with threads is that they are boring because people don’t know how to write them. They are their own thing not a stupidly formatted essay
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Rorty  pfp
Rorty
@rorty
Woke up this morning. Saw threads was a thing. Logged on and didn’t see much interesting or new, but they did reference Mastedon in the onboarding process. First thought “what does Dan Romero think.”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp
Tayyab - d/acc
@tayyab
Clearly so. Surprising that Zuck allowed a product to be launched with very poor thought. They didn’t consider picking the right initial network at all it seems.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gabriel Ayuso ⌁ pfp
Gabriel Ayuso ⌁
@gabrielayuso.eth
Too soon to tell tbh
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
Why dud?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction