Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Haven't played around with Perplexity. Do people find it more accurate? https://twitter.com/rauchg/status/1725219297440776646
21 replies
1 recast
13 reactions
Leo pfp
Leo
@lsn
I tend to find it a bit clunky and less receptive to feedback when I try push its boundaries It’s a GPT wrapper with more incentive to sacrifice usefulness for a given query in order to be more honest. It has value
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
//trip pfp
//trip
@heytrip.eth
It's pretty good. It's citations are usually pretty spot on but I'm more interested in their bridge into infra right now.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
I use glimpse.surf instead :D
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Sriram Krishnan pfp
Sriram Krishnan
@sriramk.eth
It has maybe the strongest consumer UX in the category.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Alok Vasudev pfp
Alok Vasudev
@alok
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
maurelian pfp
maurelian
@maurelian.eth
It was , but ChatGPT is catching up
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cristian Strat pfp
Cristian Strat
@c
I find it _less_ accurate; it seems to hallucinate more than ChatGPT.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Yes. Replaced chatGPT for me when I know I want accurate dev stuff. For brainstorming chatGPT without internet access was nicer but there I just ask both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tani pfp
tani
@tanishq
Used it in the first wave when only perplexity had search capabilities, although a good UX but first impression hallucinations really threw me off
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
it's very good, has replaced lots of my Google queries, esp for things like "What did Apple announced yesterday" kinda query.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
frdysk.framedl.eth pfp
frdysk.framedl.eth
@frdysk
Not necessarily, still a lot of hallucinations on non-general stuff, gotta cross check on google and chatgpt. I'm using the free version, maybe that's why.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Papajams pfp
Papajams
@papa
Useful coding copilot tool in the Arsenal, tends to condense less I find (than Claude or Bing) . Accuracy specifically - gpt3.5 standards sprinkled with sourcing for good measure (check them though, sometimes nonsensical)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brad Barrish pfp
Brad Barrish
@bradbarrish
I like it, but without the ability to use custom instructions, which I use extensively.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Drew Volpe pfp
Drew Volpe
@drew
I love it for research questions or learning about an academic topic. Definitely better than ChatGPT.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Toledano pfp
Joe Toledano
@joetoledano
Not a power user but it seems really conducive to going down "wikipedia rabbitholes"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Seemed better initial, fell off a bit, but I’m bullish on their long term so I use it as search is the best way to go.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Warpmaster General pfp
Warpmaster General
@my
No, it's a wrapper around gpt3.5. The UX is just oriented entirely to quick lookups with sources.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jq pfp
jq
@jackqack
Hard to say on accuracy as at this point I just trust ChatGPT way more. But Perplexity UX and speed is just on another level – I enjoy using it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MetaEnd🎩 pfp
MetaEnd🎩
@metaend.eth
I use perplexity a lot on mobile, but other than that I find Bing chat more accurate. Subjective of course
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction