Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/frames-v2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Blockheim pfp
Blockheim
@blockheim
Evaluating aspect ratios for Frames V2 preview: The current 1.91:1 standard doesn’t meet all builders’ needs, so we’re considering 5:4 or 3:2 as alternatives 🖼️. Screenshot of the variants is attached. Let us know which works best for your use case👇
20 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
Steve pfp
Steve
@stevedylandev.eth
Am I the only one that thinks it doesn’t matter since v2 frames are full screen? 😅 This was a much bigger deal when you had to interact with frames that stuck with that aspect ratio; you had to capitalize on space. With v2 and full blown apps it feels like a moot point, other than cramming info onto the cover before someone clicks on it.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Nicolaus pfp
Nicolaus
@nicolaus
Have you considered 16:9? Pretty common ratio for many social media feeds and a standard for digital displays. Otherwise, 3:2 might be best — stays narrow to not clog the feed, also has pretty wide adoption on social feeds, and very common for photography.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Wayne Worth pfp
Wayne Worth
@alongcamewayne
chose 5:4 in the poll but want to change to 3:2. it's enough space and doesn't take too much real estate
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
matt 💭 pfp
matt 💭
@matthewmorek
3:2 sounds like the best of all options, pretty balanced. has my vote. maybe you should start a poll? 😂
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Brian Felix is working on it pfp
Brian Felix is working on it
@chamaquito.eth
5:4 is the best
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
can I answer this as a user?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MOΞ pfp
MOΞ
@moe
nice! 3:2 is the best. even asked for it months ago for v1 frames.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Colin Johnson 💭 pfp
Colin Johnson 💭
@cojo.eth
Tie between 3:2 and 5:4 for me. Don’t forget to vote in the poll!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Lord Dalresin🐝 pfp
Lord Dalresin🐝
@dalresin
3:2 is perfect
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
Both 5:4 and 3:2 feel good to me, 1.91:1 is too limiting for even a good display frame Both of these ratios leave enough space for more information dense apps but don’t consume the entire feed on mobile
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ran Domero pfp
Ran Domero
@randomerror.eth
you use light mode? wtf
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Tony D’Addeo pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
@atlas can you summarize the replies to this cast?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
1:1 and 3:2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rodrigo Bardin pfp
Rodrigo Bardin
@rodrigobardin
it’d be pretty cool to have 4:5 and 2:3 as these are more mobile friendly — as mentioned below, 9:16 would perhaps be too much. https://warpcast.com/rodrigobardin/0x682df96e
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Gut says 5:4, even though rationale feels stronger for 3:2.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
3:2 gets my untrained eye & vote as long as we devs don't need to continuously change image sizes, I don't care. Pick a size. Any size & stick with it 🙏 😭
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cake One 🎩🔵🎭🔴 pfp
Cake One 🎩🔵🎭🔴
@theonlycakeone
if we can't have adaptive size, i would pick 5/4 because it doesn't take too much space but in the same time won't crop content as much as 1.91:1 or 3:2 do.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵 pfp
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
All of the above for artists. Their aspect ratios change piece by piece.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DegenFans 🔐 pfp
DegenFans 🔐
@degenfans
1.91:1 and 1:1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction